Anonymous #1 6w

Sorry, Biden did, Kamala would

1

Anonymous #1 6w

Biden and his rallying of NATO to the aid of Ukraine is the only reason they are still independent. Trumps appeasement isn’t even a little bit comparable to Biden.

8

Anonymous #2 6w

I mean yeah, I meant in regards to sending them weapons again but simplified it more than necessary

1

Anonymous #1 6w

Trump is the sole reason for several thousand Ukrainian deaths. Damn near the entire GOP was in line supporting Ukraine, it was a bipartisan issue, until the Donald weighed in and suddenly aid couldn’t pass in congress. He ran on stopping the war, and the only way he can do that against Putin is more weapons and support for the Ukrainians. He is playing right into Putins hand

7

Anonymous #2 6w

Oh yeah, I think he knows he is

1

Anonymous #2 6w

My crackpot theory is that it’s a secret alliance against china in the upcoming war in 2027

1

Anonymous #1 6w

That’s extremely crackpot. Russia wouldn’t benefit at all from that, just like they wouldn’t benefit being china’s ally in a war against the U.S.

1

Anonymous #1 6w

Do you remember the meeting Trump and JD Vance had with Zelensky? That was really bad.

1

Anonymous #3 6w

I know. I don’t support trumps actions

3

Anonymous #2 6w

Hypothetically they could, if they’re given chinas warm water ports

1

Anonymous #1 6w

Yeah but the end to the Russian state from NATO invasion kind of limits the benefits of a port doesn’t it.

1

Anonymous #2 6w

Yeah, which would be why they would prefer to be with us over china id think

1

Anonymous #2 6w

Granted, neutral would make most sense

1

Anonymous #1 6w

This is just insanely crackpot, I’d argue they have just as much to lose in a war with China, they aren’t in a position to stop China from taking the entire Russian pacific coast. There’s also no credible evidence they’re looking for that, or we’d accept.

1