Anonymous #1 13w

And men voted for every other invasion ever

-5

Anonymous #2 13w

Ok? Doesn’t seem like the record for women is that clean either though

9

Anonymous #1 13w

Give me a list of 5 women that started wars

-5

Anonymous OP 13w

Many Russian tzarinas, but Cathrine the Great (coup, wars with Crimea, Ottoman Empire, and that whole Poland ordeal) Cathrine de Medici (St. Bartholomew’s day massacre, Religious Wars in France) Boudicca (revolt against Romans) Zenobia of Palmyra (conquered Roman Arabia) Maria Theresa has a large hand in starting Seven Years’ war

9

Anonymous og_beer 13w

Good thing those were hundreds of years ago huh? Before presidents existed and before there was a constitution

-6

Anonymous og_beer 13w

Now try naming the 5 most recent, you know in today's age where we have technology and can communicate with other countries

-7

Anonymous #4 13w

Men are historically way more violent than women. The reason we have domestic abuse shelters is due to men. It's men in murder cases over 95% of the time. Do you genuinely believe that?

-2

Anonymous OP 13w

Maria Lvova-Belova didn’t start the invasion of Ukraine, but she has an arrest warrant for war crimes related to the forced deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, so she’s worth mentioning

8

Anonymous OP 13w

Yes. Human nature, much like other animals, dictate that we kill each other for reasons that are known and unknown. Whether it’s because we look different or think different. Women aren’t immune to that just because they’re “less aggressive”.

8

Anonymous OP 13w

So you can pull up the “men are historically” point but won’t accept the fact that women started wars

1

Anonymous OP 13w

Considering wars involve soldiers instead of the person who actually declares war, I don’t think this is a valid analogy

1

Anonymous OP 13w

Do you think we couldn’t communicate with other countries before modern technology

7

Anonymous OP 13w

Can I remind you of MARGARET FUCKING THATCHER, who’s personal war monger if achievements have filled multiple books? But sure, beyond her, Hillary Clinton (Libya, 2011) Alice Auma (Uganda, 1986) Comandata Romana (Mexico, 1994) Indira Ghandi (India, 1971) Rosa Luxembourg (Germany, 1919)

8

Anonymous og_beer 13w

Was about to mention Indira Gandhi but I think Pakistan was the initial aggressor in that war in 1971

2

Anonymous #1 13w

welp she did some bad stuff in 1984 too

4

Anonymous #1 13w

Arguably India was more than ready to go to war due to the massive humanitarian strain from refugees. Allegedly, Pakistan just launched their preemptive air strikes before India had a chance to begin their more strategic start. It was just a messy conflict all around

3

Anonymous #1 13w

Wasn’t it her Sikh guards who killed her in revenge or am I tripping

3

Anonymous #6 13w

Yep

1

Anonymous #1 13w

Oh yeah she got assassinated for a reason yaknow lol

-1

Anonymous og_beer 13w

Ah, I see

1

Literally nothing changes the fact that you guys will name women yet, for every woman there will be thousands of violent men! Men are still more likely to kill people and start a war lol

-2

Anonymous OP 13w

Plus I can tell every person in these comments is a man so do you seriously think i feel "cooked"??? By men??🤣

-1

Anonymous OP 13w

Of course you guys are defending yourself and calling it human nature

-1

Read my replies and lmk where I said only men have started wars. Till then i'll be sitting in my comfy bed feeling un cooked

1

Anonymous OP 13w

Again, if you get rid of men, the problem still exists. Playing these competitive “games” based on sex and/or gender is dumb as fuck.

1

Anonymous #4 13w

Problems would never exist to the magnitude that they are now. Women are naturally non violent to other women. I literally have to carry a taser on me when I'm walking at night because of men? Not women. People have already admitted that men are more violent. It's literally a proven fact. If men didn't exist, our biggest threat would be gone. That doesn't mean we resort to killing eachother. Women are ahead of men literally since birth in so many ways. We understand not to use violence

-2

Anonymous #4 13w

The whole point of this post is that MEN LOVE KILLING THINGS!! Men hunt for FUN

-2

Anonymous OP 13w

And women don’t too?

8

Anonymous OP 13w

You know what…this conversation is too stupid to engage with for me. I’m gonna bow out. You’re right, men are innately evil and love to kill. Girls rock!

6

Anonymous OP 13w

No lmao I’m just an Indian who knows my history

2

Anonymous OP 13w

Amazing bait tbh. Or just moving the goalposts

5

I didn't say they've never hunted fatass. Look at statistics it's always the majority of men doing violent things and you literally can't prove it wrong. Stop being a pick me it's annoying

0

Anonymous OP 13w

Oh so we’re being fatphobic now?

3

Anonymous #1 13w

You're just annoying and also most likely a fatass no offense

-3

Anonymous #1 13w

Also... yes

-2

Anonymous OP 13w

Definitely not lmao, single digit body fat percentage

0

Anonymous OP 13w

Wisdom chases you, but you are faster

8

Anonymous OP 13w

You said “I love how it’s only men who have decided that the only way to achieve peace is to kill a bunch of people first”. Don’t go back on your words now that you’ve been proven wrong. This is why they say “winning an argument with a genius is hard but winning an argument with an idiot is impossible”. Don’t be the idiot

4

Anonymous #10 13w

There’s some research that found that polities with female rulers participated in more wars than those with male ones (however this does include the caveat that unmarried queens were most likely to be invaded, but also married queens attacked others more often than married kings attacked) https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/BFI_WP_2019120.pdf

2

Anonymous #10 13w

oops sorry i accidentally basically repeated you i didn’t see ur comment

1