Off topic but did they just use commas everywhere back then? Two look unnecessary
14
Anonymous13h
great great, now continue reading to the 25th amendment. your next assignment is a review of the Declaration of Independence compared to the current administration. class dismissed!
8
Anonymous13h
No one wants to ban guns entirely 💀
1
Anonymous8h
You are quite literally less free with trump than any other president.
1
Anonymous#113h
Literally wondered this for years
9
Anonymous#213h
Haha yeah right back to 8th grade librul
1
Anonymous#413h
Just talked to a guy who wants to ban all my hunting rifles and shotguns
-2
Anonymous#113h
Commas were mainly used to denote pauses when reading out loud in that era rather than for separating clauses, so I guess it just sounded right to them. Literally just based on vibes
7
Anonymous#313h
My best guess is they just wrote it as it would be spoken aloud while adding commas for emphasis, but I’m not fully sure
4
Anonymous#113h
The part before the comma explains the purpose of the amendment, which OP is choosing to ignore. BECAUSE a well-regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state, the right...
4
AnonymousOP13h
Yeah, I saw that conversation, literally no one is stopping you from hypothetically purchasing a firearm that doesn’t violate the law. Regulating a right is not infringing on that right and SCOTUS would agree.
5
AnonymousOP13h
no you didn’t
-1
Anonymous#413h
Hard to believe you’ve never met anyone who does
5
Anonymous#113h
A lot of millennial libs think they should be banned in my experience
4
Anonymous#113h
Complete ban is unconstitutional, would have to repeal the 2nd Amendment to do that
0
Anonymous#413h
Well banning is banning, call it what it is and don't try to hide behind petty euphemisms
0
AnonymousOP13h
Yes, banning is banning, banning all guns would be a ban, banning only assault rifles for example would be a legal regulation that’s literally been done before
0
Anonymous#413h
Under Heller you need to prove the arm is both unusually dangerous and not in common use, semi autos of all types and 11+ round mags are the standard nowadays.
0
AnonymousOP13h
Then we should change the standard lmfao?
0
Anonymous#413h
Well you'd have to repeal the 2nd and deal with the possible consequences of trying that in America lol
0
AnonymousOP13h
You don’t have to repeal the 2nd to ban magazines with 10+ rounds, you don’t know how the law works at all 💀
0
Anonymous#413h
Well its pretty hard to say they aren't in common use when both large capacity magazines and semi automatic firearms take up around 75% of the market
0
AnonymousOP12h
Then 25% of the market is compliant? So buy something from them? Like I don’t see how market share matters here lmfao
1
Anonymous#412h
Cause the Heller decision states that the 2a protects arms within common use?
0
Anonymous#88h
Also true
1
Anonymous#88h
Guys not even really pro gun either
1
AnonymousOP8h
So go get your gun and do something about it coward
1
Anonymous#88h
Nah thats illegal
1
Anonymous#88h
Cant kill the president guy we gotta trust in our democracy fr and elect a better republican
1
AnonymousOP8h
So what’s the point of the 2nd amendment if you won’t adhere to it? Rights are being infringed on and democracy is being threatened. Might as well give up the gun