Yik Yak logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 14h
This…just this… This is somehow OK, but a book about a kid having two dads is a problem Make that make sense
Girl Talk icon
Girl Talk 21h
Conservatives are always saying that LGBTQ are grooming children and exposing them to sexual stuff, meanwhile they are okay with this whole ad campaign. Along with bringing their young boys to hooters 🤮
5758 upvotes, 332 comments. Yik Yak image post by Anonymous in Girl Talk. "Conservatives are always saying that LGBTQ are grooming children and exposing them to sexual stuff, meanwhile they are okay with this whole ad campaign. Along with bringing their young boys to hooters 🤮"
comment

8
upvote 22 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 11h

Conservative here. BOTH are disgusting. Not sure how this is allowed, or legal.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7h

As someone who’s arguably more conservative than most on this board. Actually I’m theoretically more conservative than most conservatives I just don’t tow their lines on quite a few things and hate the idea of a pitched identity saying I must do something or else I’m out of the group: We don’t need any kind of extra marketed sexual distraction of any flavor. It’s hard enough to focus on work as it is without someone being paid to put tits in front of my face or anyone elses. 1/2

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 14h

Exactly. How can you hate homosexuality but want to see naked hot women? So contradictory.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 12h

Why is everyone downvoting? I’m literally agreeing.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 7h

2/2 so I’m with you in spirit OP. I get that people have online ad campaigns with targeted audiences who are fully grown people with agency, but adding sexual thoughts to everyone, including children, is at bare minimum, extremely discourteous.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 7h

I should specify that targeting children with sexual thoughts and imagery is grounds for investigation.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 7h

Not telepathy… yall get what i mean. If someone is intentionally telling a child to imagine something sexual, that warrants investigation.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4h

…a book about a kid having two dads is disgusting?

upvote 3 downvote