Anonymous #1 11h

it doesn’t! it just so happens that a portion of the population consists of furries, and a portion of the flight industry also consists of furries. “what is it about government that attracted poc” well poc exist,

8

Anonymous #2 11h

Please don’t group poc in with furries… furries are a recent thing and I’m trying to be as academic as I can about this because pilots are already a statistical outlier on many things.

1

Anonymous #1 11h

i’m not trying to “group poc in with furries”? i’m using a an example of another section of the population to help clarify my point :) like obviously i’m not trying to group government with the flight industry

12

Anonymous #2 11h

Ah okay. I see what you’re getting at. That makes sense. I’ll clarify as well. So something like someone being a poc def isn’t a security risk, but I’ll tell you from my industry which is occasionally flight industry adjacent, ANY sexual fetish that’s an extreme becomes a security issue. Basically if it’s distracting enough, or easily exploitable by a foreign government/criminal organization, we sort of expect them to try. Which isn’t great news for anyone with an extreme sexual fetish or 1/

0

Anonymous #1 11h

2/2 or our industry, but, we did find there was focused data on specific jobs/departments and specific sexual fetishes which again, super weird, but easy enough to sort out why that was. I was wondering if pilots was one of those for furries but, if it’s just a % of total people = % of total pilots thing… Yeah some Chinese/Russian/Rogue AI could try to leverage that for malicious ends but… actually I’ll just let the people who handle that kind of thing do their thing. Tommy might not be 2/3

1

Anonymous #1 11h

3/3 the best person to be a leading spokesman on this one.

1

Anonymous #2 11h

I should also clarify it’s often the biggest issue when someone’s married and leading a double life… there’s all sorts of twists and turns when people get into the extremes that become exploitable.

1