Anonymous #2 21h

A gun that fell out after he was chased out of the store. He never aimed at or threatened the store owner or his son.

26

Anonymous #2 21h

The store owner that chased the kid down and shot him? Yeah he did how else would he hunt down and kill him

19

Anonymous #3 21h

The store owners that shot and killed them

26

Anonymous #2 21h

If there’s a chance you’re gonna get chased around and shot at whenever you go to the store, then you’re gonna carry a gun.

23

Anonymous bongo_fury 21h

As a 14yo?

-3

Anonymous #1 21h

Starts as soon as you’re able to assess risk

14

Anonymous bongo_fury 21h

Wouldn't brandishing a weapon greatly increase said risk

-4

Anonymous #1 21h

He could have been 9, are ignoring that he was being chased out of a store by two men, with guns, for a crime he didn’t even commit?

11

Anonymous OP 20h

The court/jury came to the conclusion that he didn't shoplift or pull a gun?

1

Anonymous #1 20h

Regardless of the court’s decision, we also have a right to make our own judgments as to what happened based off the evidence we have available.

1

Anonymous #1 20h

It doesn’t matter who points the gun, the expectation of having a gun pointed at you creates the necessity of having a gun. A violent environment makes people more inclined to violence.

4

Anonymous #1 20h

They didn’t have to come to that conclusion because there was video evidence of him putting the water back.

1

Anonymous #1 20h

But did he pull out the gun?

12

Anonymous #3 20h

"Regardless of what the judge and jury decides, having seen all of the facts. I wish to draw my own conclusions with limited knowledge" are you maga perchance?

-1

Anonymous bongo_fury 20h

That's what would have made it a self defense case, yes

-1

Anonymous #1 20h

Do you know when he did this specifically?

5

Anonymous bongo_fury 20h

According to the defense it seems that he pointed the gun outside of the store

1

Anonymous #1 20h

OJ Simpson and Casey Anthony were innocent too, right?

7

Anonymous #6 20h

Oj being found not guilty was racist in what way?

-2

Anonymous #1 20h

I’m asking you lmao they were found innocent by the juries, so you believe they were innocent too, right?

6

Anonymous #1 20h

So after hed been chased out of the store

7

Anonymous #6 20h

I dont think his verdict was influenced based on race? Do you think otherwise

-3

Anonymous #1 20h

Were they innocent. Yes or no.

7

Anonymous bongo_fury 20h

Yes

-1

Anonymous #6 19h

I really dont know anything about casey Anthony tbh. But with oj there wasn't enough evidence to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" he was guilty. But im pretty sure he lost a civil case

-2

Anonymous #1 19h

That’s a lot of words to say no tbh

8

Anonymous #6 19h

My bad I didn't realize that was a lot for you Your turn, how was his verdict racist?

-2

Anonymous #1 19h

There ample proof showing he didn’t brandish a gun. The corner said that with the way the bullet entered his body he wasn’t turned around. There was no proof he stole water bottles. He’s on camera putting the all back. There’s more than enough evidence proving he didn’t shoot this kid out of defense and that deadly force wasn’t needed..

9

Anonymous #1 13h

i don't understand why some of you choose to be obtuse. i can't tell if it's an ego thing or what. because there's no way you're as dense as you're acting

7

Anonymous themind._.ofhueyfreeman25 12h

There isn't any video evidence that he did or didn't pull a weapon correct?

0

Anonymous #1 12h

The fact that the gun wasn’t on his person when he was shot is corroborated by both witness and police statements

3

Anonymous #8 12h

Can you explain how this or oj's case was racist? The other guy couldn't

-1

Anonymous #1 9h

No, there’s video evidence he didn’t pull a gun. He did have one and it came out when he fell. The corner literally said with the way the bullet entered he couldn’t have been turned around facing them. He was shot in the back

1