Sure, let’s set the standard. Do you think that we should encourage policies that protect life, and the quality of it?

1

Good. So before we actually debate. I assume that means then you’re in favor of reducing healthcare costs, any and all gender affirming care for adults and minors, affordable housing, stuff like that?

0

Cool, I just wanted to get your stance on a life protecting standard like HRT. Glad to hear that honestly. Okay, so I won’t argue the scientific consensus of when life starts. But I will argue on why you think we should prioritize one over the other. So give me your thoughts on that.

1

But why, why does the fetus inherently matter more to you than the mother?

1

Then why do you feel the need to prioritize a fetus if you don’t believe they matter inherently more? Shouldn’t it then be a case by case basis?

0

But you are in every other case

1

But why do they have that right to live over something that does not want it? You are inherently deciding that one party does not have as much power as the other.

0

But why do they have the right to live over something that does not want it? It’s not like this fetus does not inherently pull from the mother. It damages her and puts her body through things that can never be reversed in a lot of cases. What gives them that right over the mother?

1

Anonymous #1 12w

You’d agree with the other person if you thought that the fetus deserved the same right as a person. That’s the fundamental question of abortion debates, debates hen is the fetus considered a person with legal rights and the right to life.

1

Anonymous #6 12w

If I thought different things I’m sure I’d agree with them yes

1