Anonymous #1 14w

Yeah, I’ve noticed the act is rarely called a murder in headlines or news articles. It’s always couched in such a way that I assumed it was to avoid lawsuits

2

Anonymous #2 14w

Wouldn’t it be like “falsely” accusing whoever shot the person of committing a crime before they’re charged with murder, essentially defaming them?

3

Anonymous #3 14w

Depends in this scenario I think it's we know who shot him we don't know the why it happened

1

Anonymous #3 14w

Exactly

1

Anonymous #1 14w

we know why it happened lmao

1

Anonymous #3 14w

Yes, the other option would be “allegedly murdered” which sounds worse to me tbh

1

Anonymous #4 14w

You can guess but that's how you get served

0

Anonymous #1 14w

hardly, the guy shot murdered him is sanctioned by 8 countries (formerly 9) and is a known leader of settler terrorism. the victim was involved in a documentary that exposes settler violence, pretty cut and dry. not to mention, there’s a pretty obvious reason that settlers rape and murder palestinians in the west bank. because they can.

1

Anonymous #4 14w

Again if you wrong it doesn't matter, a lot of civil trials you aren't allowed to bring up past actions

0

Anonymous #1 14w

When you publish thousands of articles a year if you were to assume everytime you'd be wrong at least a few

0

Anonymous #1 14w

here’s the issue… this isn’t an ambiguous situation, we fucking know what happened. and also, quit that bullshit about them protecting themselves, they use emotional and accusatory language whenever something happens to white or jewish people. israelis are murdered, palestinians “die”.

1