Anonymous #2 4d

damn, just openly pro-pedophile huh?

29

Anonymous #2 4d

I thought y’all were “save the children”

48

Anonymous #1 4d

Nah fuck them kids

-11

Anonymous #2 4d

Ragebait or pedophile supporter

26

Anonymous #2 4d

How is quoting someone bad?

18

Anonymous #4 4d

How is it not bad?

-6

Anonymous #2 4d

Because you’re reminding people of what someone said

18

Anonymous #4 4d

I mean it might be bad to quote Charlie Kirk because he said a bunch of bad shit

5

Anonymous #4 4d

Sounds illegal to me

-4

Anonymous #4 4d

It’s ragebait

20

Anonymous #3 4d

It’s not very good rage bait, if it was confusion bait then it’s flawless

10

Anonymous #5 4d

Nobody justifying somebodies death. Just memorial of his impact.

35

Anonymous #7 4d

give me one reason I should be sympathetic to this guy

30

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 4d

I really don’t care if you’re sympathetic or not I’m not sympathetic to leftist. It’s just know your job might care though.

-12

Anonymous #7 4d

So you’re saying you and your ilk are going to coerce people into having to FEEL a certain way? Thanks for letting me know you believe in Thought Crimes.

18

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 4d

You’re welcome

-7

Anonymous #7 4d

Sigma penis licker

4

Anonymous #7 4d

what happened to “just using our first amendment”? or do only neonazis have the right to free speech without consequence?

12

Anonymous #8 4d

Idk why you bring that up I don’t think communists should have a 1st amendment right.

-5

Anonymous #7 4d

bro doesn’t know the definition of the word “right”

11

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 4d

Just give prospective towards my stance on free speech so that person doesn’t ask a dumb question like that again.

-5

Anonymous #7 4d

I think it’s a perfectly reasonable question, since most people do in fact know what the word “right” means, and you’re an oddity for not knowing that

1

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 4d

If rights existed the whole world would conform and have the same exact rights, the rights afforded to you in America won’t exist in Europe Nether will the rights in Europe exist in America so on and so forth.

-2

Anonymous #7 4d

Rights are in fact socially constructed, but if you believe something to be a right that means you believe everyone has it. Again, definitions seem hard for you.

8

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 4d

Then rights don’t exist if something is given to you it can be taken away a right is something that can’t be taken from you.

-1

Anonymous #7 4d

I hope you realize how staunchly unAmerican your stance is lmao. Regardless, because of how American law works, the government cannot infringe on the First Amendment right, which is afforded to all PEOPLE.

14

Anonymous #7 4d

Jobs should not care whether or not their employees care that some random person died, much less someone as horrific as Charlie Kirk. You implied that firing people who feel no sympathy for Charlie was a good thing and then said you don’t care in the very next comment. You conservatives are all fucking idiots that can’t maintain a modicum of consistency.

10

Anonymous #5 4d

No. Clarifying that Charlie Kirk was an awful human being in the aftermath of his death is not justifying the manner in which he was killed. Hope this helps

1