Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download

ireallylikepancakes

Elon couldn’t think his way out of a paper bag.
Maybe you should make SpaceX and then you can talk.
upvote 21 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

Good thing he isn’t in a paper bag

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

Love him or hate him, it’s an objective fact that he is very intelligent and has a very high IQ

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

Nah he dum af

upvote 2 downvote
🏴‍☠️
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

IQ tests are horseshit

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

That’s objectively false and your personal opinion of him doesn’t change that fact. Sorry. Ted Kaczynski was a horrible person, but that doesn’t change the fact that he was extremely smart

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> ireallylikepancakes 3w

Firstly, no they aren’t, cope harder. Secondly, that doesn’t change the fact that his objective intelligence is high. That doesn’t mean you have to agree with what he says or believes, but you have to separate your personal views of him from objective facts

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

Nah he dum dum

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Say it all you want, it doesn’t make it true 🤷‍♂️

upvote 0 downvote
🏴‍☠️
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

I don’t think many smart men would openly try to buy an election.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> ireallylikepancakes 3w

How exactly did he “buy” it? By using his money to support a candidate? Firstly, do you think he’s the first billionaire to do that? He’s not. Secondly, how exactly is that unintelligent? Perhaps if what he was doing was illegal and he didn’t know it or thought he could get away with it then you could say it’s dumb. You’re simply conflating your personal dislike of him for his objective intelligence. You’re clearly incapable of separate your personal opinions from objectives facts

upvote 5 downvote
🏴‍☠️
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

“You’re clearly incapable of separate your personal opinions from objectives facts” I can, I just like making quippy comments. Plus, he literally tried to bribe voters.

post
upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> ireallylikepancakes 3w

There’s nothing wrong with a lil bribe

upvote 0 downvote
🏴‍☠️
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Lmao they prefer the term “lil treat”

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> ireallylikepancakes 3w

So you care more about making quirky comments than telling the truth? Thank you for admitting you don’t care about the truth, now we can immediately disregard anything you have to say. Also, he didn’t bribe voters smh, it was a million-dollar giveaway/online raffle for anyone who signed a pledge of support for his PAC, he wasn’t paying people to vote a certain way. Hence why the case went nowhere.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> ireallylikepancakes 3w

*quippy

upvote 1 downvote
🏴‍☠️
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Nah, I just don’t think Elon defenders are worth it. Like, the man literally ignores scientific facts that he doesn’t like (trans people exist), most of his “inventions” weren’t made by him, he got a head start in life due to slave labor, he genuinely thinks that he needs to get as many women pregnant as possible to save humanity, and he thinks everyone who disagrees with him is an NPC It’s possible to be smart AND an idiot.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Using “objectively” like that is a sign of brain damage from arguing online too much

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> ireallylikepancakes 2w

Eh smart and an idiot are opposites, you can’t be both, but you can believe and do both smart and idiotic things but at the end of the day someone’s intelligence or aspects of it falls somewhere on the scale. Also, in all fairness, the emerald mine his dad had a stake in didn’t use slave labor, or at least there’s no evidence of it. Also, the mine was in Zambia, not Apartheid South Africa.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

How exactly? At this point you’re just grasping for straws to try to make some point to deflect from the fact that what I said was right

upvote 1 downvote
🏴‍☠️
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Listen, can we argue later? Im tired.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> ireallylikepancakes 2w

Fair enough lol

upvote 1 downvote
🏴‍☠️
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Thank you. Sleep well!

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

IQ tests reliably measure your ability to complete IQ tests. A simple change in culture affects scores because the concepts aren’t universal.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Not really, given that IQ tests test brain functions like logical reasoning and processing-speeds. Any “IQ test” that relies on measures dependent on skills that need to be taught such as knowledge of a particular subject or pronunciation of certain languages given different languages have different pronunciations aren’t objective measures, but they aren’t considered legitimate IQ tests by academic, psychological and scientific standards

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Legitimate IQ tests test brain functions that people are born with and thus aren’t dependent on culture. They are a part of your intellect as a human, but that are skills that can be honed or practiced to a degree

upvote 6 downvote