Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1d

Those bourgeoisie don’t want to do anything about the current messed up system

3

Anonymous #3 1d

no.

-3

Anonymous OP 1d

Why not

10

Anonymous #4 1d

Yes, Tibet, Gaza and Native Americans

1

Anonymous #4 1d

not entirely practical, sure there could be some form of power given to tribes in america but at the end of the day, that’s not going to happen.

0

Anonymous #2 1d

As much as I am for this how are you gonna give power back to an extreme minority in a group of 360 million people. Do you mean their historical lands? I’m sure something could be arranged but it’s not practical to move the people who probably currently inhabit it. It’s a nice and sweet idea but it doesn’t have any fundamental basis in realism. Having said that Amerindians have def been mistreated and forms of restitution of some sort should be investigated

-3

Anonymous #5 1d

who said anything about people having to move after giving land back to native/indigenous Americans? it sounds like you don’t really know much about the land back movement at all tbh

5

Anonymous #5 22h

practical land back starts with taking public lands (national parks, wmas, etc.) and ceding them back to the indigenous nations

8

Anonymous OP 18h

look at California and the Yurok Tribe. You sound goofy as shit bruh

6

Anonymous #6 16h

yeah let’s look at one tribe out of the almost 600 tribes good point you really got me thete

-1

Anonymous _orangutan 16h

ugh i hate you why did you comment on my post

-1

Anonymous #8 16h

yes

0

Anonymous OP 16h

RE: “that’s not going to happen”, when I named one explicit example of it happening very recently. Want more? If you also include Shasta, Tule River, Washoe Tribe Pomo tribe, and the tribal stewardship policies being put in place, over 7 million acres are being returned to the authority of tribal nations. Precedents are being set, drop your defeatist and dismissive mindset

3

Anonymous #6 16h

I don’t personally care about it but that’s the cool thing about opinions

-1

Anonymous OP 16h

how convenient. you are the model performative liberal/leftist. native people are still here and people like you shouldn’t be driving the social narrative of American politics.

4

Anonymous _orangutan 16h

I mean tell me if I’m wrong OP but I think the point of the post is that while a successful transition to communism would be most ideal, that’s not going to realistically happen anytime soon so the best we can do now is democratic socialism. Which is a step in the right direction and more achievable than an immediate cessation of capitalism

6

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 16h

based. democratic socialism > social democracy

6

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 15h

yes exactly

3

Anonymous #6 15h

good thing i’m not liberal and i’m not driving the social narrative. i made a post on yik yak let’s clam down.

-1

Anonymous #6 15h

Yk reading your comment I realized I misread the post and swapped my words around lmao. Point still stands tho, social democracy is a better first step towards democratic socialism and ultimately communism than nothing. Although I know some folks believe even entertaining those ideologies harms the greater mission, which I think I disagree with but I’m open to hear about

3

Anonymous OP 15h

leftism starts at anti-racism and blatantly stating that you don’t care about landback, which is a core issue in the indigenous American community, is racism. So you’re either a liberal or worse in this instance. Because suggesting “some type of restitution” but disregarding the work being done is performative, dismissive, and racist.

1

Anonymous #6 15h

you genuinely sound like the worst person to be around. we got bigger fish to fry than landback right now. sorry i’m not as woke as you 🫩

-2

Anonymous OP 15h

I’d encourage everyone to do some research and read about this from Indigenous people directly! It’s the root of pretty much all our political issues right now.

5

Anonymous #3 12h

exactly, especially in the global climate change conversation. We need to more people to be aware and understanding of this and not be dismissive. Indigenous people will lead us back to sustainability. It’s not a matter of being of being more “woke” than another, it’s just being to actually effectively comprehend the weight intersectionality has in local and global politics. Indigenous people will lead us back to balance in the coming lifetimes.

2