Anonymous #1 8w

It's the same rhetoric that the OG gay rights movement fought against

-10

Anonymous OP 8w

No it’s not lol

8

Anonymous OP 8w

no it isn’t? being gay isn’t a crime. while you sick fucks are justifying the sexual abuse of children

8

Anonymous OP 8w

The the fuck it isn’t

5

Anonymous #4 8w

I defend equality under the law for all, something that lawyers are tossing out.

-4

Anonymous OP 8w

you are literally arguing that rich and powerful pedophiles should not be investigated or prosecuted…

5

Anonymous #3 8w

Defending principles of law is pro-criminal? If physical violence / trafficking is present, then immediate death penalty. But blanket bans based on demographics have never worked out.

-3

Anonymous OP 8w

what are you fucking saying. you make no sense. what blanket bans? you’re the one arguing that defending pedophilia doesn’t make your own character suspect. your hard drive needs to be checked.

6

Anonymous #3 8w

Banning relationships based on sex/race/religion/caste/nationality is inherently flawed to us, yet all the 'arguments' made in favor from the past of each are the EXACT SAME ones used in controlling the sexual behavior/autonomy in future generations.

-4

Anonymous OP 8w

holy shit you’re literally just a pedophile. raping kids is not the same as consenting adults being in a consensual interracial or gay relationship. the arguments aren’t the same. the arguments against gay or interracial relationships are that they are wrong for made up social reasons. the argument against your pedophilic tendencies is that adults raping children is harmful to the children, and that an adult and child cannot have a balanced relationship in terms of power

5

Anonymous #3 8w

You rn

-3

Anonymous OP 8w

i attacked the argument… i said adults having sex with kids is harmful to the kids. and no, it’s not irrelevant because again you’re a future child rapist, that’s worth calling out

3

Anonymous #3 8w

Criminal actions shouldn't be defined by the demographics of either side which the left used to fight to the death for. You're the one fueling the death of liberal democracy calling defending what people take for granted as "pro-criminal".

-2

Anonymous OP 8w

the criminal action is literally in the demographics you fucking idiot. children can’t consent. just say you want to fuck kids holy shit

4

Anonymous #3 8w

Get off the centrist-to-christofascist pipeline and read a book based on strict logic

-2

Anonymous #4 8w

IMO, defending pedophilia means you see no issue with it therefore making you a pedophile

4

Anonymous OP 8w

“Controlling the sexual behavior/autonomy in future generations”?!? TF?!? BRO CHILDREN SHOULDNT BE HAVING SEX WITH ADULTS!!!

3

Anonymous #5 8w

People like you can't even define "adult" without circling back to what "the law" dictates and not by individuality. Adults in one region are declared to be mentally children in another, therefore your statement is one based on begging the question.

-2

Anonymous OP 8w

omg dude at this point just say you want to f little kids

4

Anonymous OP 8w

okay. at the end of the day if you have to question whether or not a person is able to consent, just assume they are not and move on. it’s really that simple and the only kind of people who would take issue with this are people who have a fetish for nonconsent. and those people should be institutionalized for the safety of others

5

Anonymous #4 8w

Precisely - individuals have the right to express themselves not based on some blanket demographic ban. I realized this as soon as I recognized that fighting biological urges based on social norms is flawed. But then your ustase persona means that you're probably something of a reactionary doing entryism into the left.

-1

Anonymous OP 8w

nope i’m as liberal as they come baby. and i agree that individuals have a right to express themselves and do whatever they want but only up until the point that their desires infringe upon the rights and freedoms of others

7

Anonymous OP 8w

lmao lay off the fucking postmodernist slop and pick up marx if you claim to be a leftist. beauvoir and foucault raped kids, it’s just a fact.

-1

Anonymous OP 8w

I’d tell you to go to school and learn something, but I don’t think you’re allowed within 10 miles of one.

5

Anonymous OP 8w

An adult is a person 25 years old and older as they’re both physically and mentally developed

1

Anonymous #5 8w

Is there proof that doesn't parrot the endpoint of many reactionaries?

-1

Anonymous OP 8w

what is reactionary about “don’t rape children”

6

Anonymous OP 8w

Tf do u mean? Are adults still developing?

4

Anonymous #5 8w

We all develop over life. You just want the state to tell you when you get civil liberties. Plus, you're infantizing people with mental health issues. If you're over 25 and have a breakdown, does that warrant your rights being taken?

-1

Anonymous OP 8w

I think you’re being purposefully ignorant so that u can touch kids. Even a mentally ill 25 year old is physically developed 💀 once again, the body and brain in healthy people are not done developing until around 25

4

Anonymous #5 8w

Asking questions is NOT pURposefuL iGNoRanCe

-2

Anonymous OP 8w

You’re sitting here trying to justify pedophilia 😐

6

Anonymous OP 8w

it’s morally wrong for you to have sex with someone who has a mental illness or disability that renders them unable to consent. i’m seriously beginning to consider that you’ve probably raped someone and that’s why you’re so defensive, as well as why you’re trying to pose as a leftist

6

Anonymous OP 8w

Bro you sound REALLY weird rn…

3

Anonymous OP 8w

Consent is the ultimate dividing line. If you don’t understand how consent works, *please* don’t pursue a sexual relationship with anyone!

5

Anonymous #3 8w

Asking about edge cases is not arguing for those edge cases

-1

Anonymous OP 8w

If a 25 year old is mentally ill ut is morally and in some cases illegal to peruse a sexual relationship….because consent cannot be given….

5

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 8w

Precisely - this is the point I value truly not dependent on deciding which demographics have lower mental capacity. I knew this myself at 12

0

Anonymous OP 8w

Take me for example. I have some serious mental disabilities and I’m in my early twenties. But I’m still fully in control of my faculties, can understand consent and boundaries, and recognize that PEDOPHILIA IS WRONG. Some people have different disabilities with different effects on them, leading to them being unable to properly consent. Is this making sense?

5

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 8w

Yes - and you're admitting that individual circumstances should guide the debate over ad hominems

0

Anonymous OP 8w

“Individual circumstances” Anyone under 18 is off limits, don’t even.

1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 8w

You're saying that because the state said so. If you were in Saudi Arabia, you'd say that anyone unmarried is off limits. If you lived before 1967, you'd say that anyone of another race is off limits...

-1

Anonymous OP 8w

The state is saying that because science is saying that children having sex with adults is mentally scarring and can cause mental problems 😐 fucking weirdo

1

Anonymous OP 8w

Like at one point the Age Of Consent was like 7. Idgaf what the AOC is, if ur a 30+ u shouldn’t even be dating 18 year olds.

5

Anonymous OP 8w

“No, you’re brainwashed for not wanting to sleep with children!!!” -OP

2

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 8w

It’s him downvoting all the anti-pedophile rhetoric 😭😭😭😭😭😭

8

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 8w

The state has a vested bias against investigating true sexual liberation since it would promote democratization. Read real studies

-3

Anonymous OP 8w

This is the same rhetoric I’ve heard zoophiles use😭 and yes, these are real studies. Children shouldn’t be having sex with adults.

5

Anonymous OP 8w

by “true sexual liberiation” you mean non consensual sex which infringes upon peoples natural freedoms which would be anti-democratization

4

Anonymous OP 8w

“read studies” lay off the Foucault dude, the guy was a child raping, reactionary hack.

5

Anonymous OP 8w

Okay, I’m morbidly curious. What do YOU think “true sexual liberation” means?

3