Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
To everyone marching at the “No Kings” protest: You supported Biden’s rule-by-decree presidency. You defended censorship, mandates, and lawless power grabs. You’re not against kings, you’re mad yours lost his crown.
upvote -19 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Delusional believer or opportunistic liar? What does the audience think?

upvote 58 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Funny, I don’t remember Biden supporting images of him on a throne or wearing a crown, or calling himself royal titles as jokes. I don’t remember Biden threatening the insurrection act for prolonged peaceful protesting, or your claimed power grabs. But I can remember Trump doing all of the above. Only tyrant have to clarify that they aren’t a tyrant, you’re a joke

upvote 22 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Cope. Seethe even

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w
post
upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w
post
upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w
post
upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

I think they're just slow in the head

upvote 33 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 2w
post
upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 2w

Cute propaganda infographic, I used a real event Trump himself endorsed calling himself king. And the reduced crime relative to recent years you mean?

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Waiting for him to send the troops to NYC. Once he does that nyc will be safer than ever. Can’t even go to certain parts of town without proper protection because of my skin color.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 2w

Just like how there are sundown towns still? Keep crying about gang violence like it’s the lefts fault when the drug issues our country has are directly the results of our governments involvement in staging the drug wars

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Not gang violence, rampant crime. Every week there was a crime outside where I worked and I didn’t even work in the worst area.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 2w

So you live in a city 🤣 you think having fascist white supremacists kicking out minorities is an upgrade? And how do you somehow connect city crime to democrat policy other than by saying some xenophobic shit about “letting the browns in” or whatever you justify it with?

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Not just a city, the biggest city in country. Right wing does not equal fascist. We are not kicking out minorities, we are kicking people whom had ILLEGALLY entered the country and especially those with crimes. Not only that the idiot that will probably get elected to office is going to defund the police, and believes in sending social workers to solve problems. In terms of you using the term “browns” that is a racist way of defining people. Not only that, I’m advocating for decreasing ALL crime

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 2w

You may be advocating for decreasing all crime but your president isn’t. If they were worried about crime or immigrant crime then they’d start there, instead they make arrests at court rooms cause it’s easiest to fill the quotas by grabbing the rule followers.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

They’re also not kicking people out simply for illegal entry, they’re stripping people of their valid visas over their speech. And save me the race sob story about how you can’t walk in certain places in nyc, what do you think it’s like for brown people in cities where ice operates? They can legally be grabbed for simply being immigrant colored and not having papers. That’s dystopian

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

No the government can take away your visa over freedom of speech. There is a video of to Harvard Law graduates saying that while you get freedom of speech on a visa, you walk a very tight line. In terms of walking, no, I really am not able to go to certain areas in my borough. I can’t go to these areas because I from a white upper middle class family, am a big target on the other side of where I live

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Show me evidence that this is happening

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 2w

What the fuck does walk a tight line mean in legal terms? They have to do that now because trump is in office, but legally and historically they don’t, no. If granted a visa you are entitled to keep that visa for its term unless you are found guilty of a crime or are a national security threat. Ozturk, one of the students this happened to, was arrested because her article apparently made her a national security threat

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

And the article, which you can look up, was simply a criticism of the way the IDF operates

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Evidence of what happening?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

It means they need to watch what they say

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 2w

This is perfectly explained by the people on TikTok “the law says what?!”. They are lawyers and Harvard law alumni

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 2w

I’m not on tiktok, what law is this that they’re referring to? The “watch what you say or else clause”? Pre trump we usually went to great lengths to not punish people over voicing opinions, even if they are opinions that the president doesn’t personally like. Freedom of speech is one of our big things here in America

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

In a recent 2024 case, the Supreme Court has ruled that the department at state, at anytime, with his discretion revoked visas

upvote 1 downvote