Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Throughout this whole restricting war, the funniest part has been watching liberals realize that it’s impossible to gerrymander most democratic states more than they already are
upvote -2 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

No? Like just no that’s incorrect

post
upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

The Blue states could gerrymander a lot more if they wanted. There is an example map of California where every representative is democratic because of gerrymandering but that is not the case currently.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

hold on you think ny couldnt gerrymander any more?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4w

This map marks North Dakota as poor when it’s literally one fucking district 😭 So not reliable

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4w

Any honest map should have Maryland red and New York yellow

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

It’s red because of the state house districts

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Well I’m not talking about those 😂

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

Well the map is 🤡

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

california? not like it needs it, but massachusetts?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Mmkay sweetheart well it’s my post so I control the narrative. I am talking about federal districts because those are what are being changed currently

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

Mmkay sweetheart. So you think the Maryland congressional districts favor democrats?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

New York absolutely could! Remember when they tried to a few years ago and were barred by a court?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Yes? That’s a well known fact

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

so what was the point of your post. democratic states absolutely could gerrymander more if they tried, especially now

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

I said most

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

New York congressional map grading

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

oh so you can gerrymander a blue state more

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

I literally said MOST states in my post. Can you even read?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

You know what else is a well known fact? The governor at that time was Republican

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

i mean its ur claim there pooks but i have yet to see anything that supports it

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

except most wouldnt be correct. california had room to and voted to, new york could, nj could, ct could, ri could, vt could, md could, washington could, oregon could

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Yeah with a democratic supermajority legislature that went over his head. I’m not asking for a 50-50 map in Maryland. I’m asking for a fair one

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4w

Maryland

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

NJ, CT, and OR are already gerrymandered heavily. So are IL, NV, and NM. Vermont only has one district 😭

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4w

This is Maryland’s congressional map. Do you really think they couldn’t give rid of the red district on the eastern shore if they wanted.

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

They didn’t go over his head. He signed it. He could have vetoed it.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4w

You really think they couldn’t make the 6 district red?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Listen dude. Maryland is gerrymandered. That’s a fact. Blue states gerrymander. That is a fact. If you’re not willing to admit that then honestly I’m not willing to discuss it anymore

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

oh but they could gerrymander more? this is rhetorical in case you couldnt tell im literally naming on memory, checking after because of how stupid this post is.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

but they could gerrymander more. thats what your post was about.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

District six is literally more competitive than it was previously prior to the 2022 redistricting. It’s less gerrymandered than it was previously. I don’t deny that blue states gerrymander (just look at Illinois on the map), but it’s a fact that red states gerrymander more.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

Then come up with statistically sound methodology to prove it was gerrymandered. Because you’re claiming a Republican just purposely gerrymandered his state for democrats 💀

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4w

False. But whatever. Have a good night

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

"nuh uh good night i win"

post
upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

I am saying he was rendered powerless and agreed to this map because he knew it was pointless to try and fight them when his veto would be overturned anyway

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

could gerrymander more tho

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

-makes claim -evidence provided against that claim -“nuh uh” -leaves

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

Show me where it says they can override his veto for this

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

I’ll show you this dick. Already showed it to your mom

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4w

I never made the claim that blue states don’t gerrymander. But your posts explicitly says it would be impossible to gerrymander most blue states more. That’s factually incorrect as shown by the map.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

Sure buddy. Cope and seethe

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

He *signed* it and said it was “almost everything we wanted”.

post
upvote 1 downvote