
Where in the Epstein files does it say Trump r*ped kids? Cite the specific page or reference, and screenshot it. I’ll wait. Trump is censored? Show me the evidence that Trump’s name is the one censored. Oh wait, he isn’t because Trump is in the Epstein files because Trump used to be friends with Epstein until Epstein hit of a teenage girl at Trump’s club
The claims that the Obama DOJ investigated and didn’t charge Trump with given that the person making the claims wasn’t even the supposed victim and the victims never corroborated the stories? Or is this one of the claims made by the FBI in 2020 during the election and the FBI under Biden dismissed it as baseless?
How would you know the word don’t is censored in the files if it’s censored. I never said screenshots don’t matter, I’m pointing out that the claims those screenshots are referencing have been considered baseless according to the Biden and Obama DOJs that never prosecuted Trump when they easily could have if he was guilty.
there's no proof any of these were romeo and juliet cases. most R&J clauses require a maximum gap of 2 years and a relationship prior to age of majority, and sometimes more conditions (parental approval, etc). you have no evidence of how many of these fall into that category, so until you do you can spare me the useless, poor comparison
Assuming there’s no Romeo and Juliette law that requires them to be within a certain age gap then yes that is pedophilia, and two of the four states that allow that are Democratic. Also, OP was referencing Omar’s false statement that in Somalia pedophiles are given the death penalty.
She didn’t put a hit on him, but she did suggest he should be executed and called him the leader of the “pedophile protection party.” Which is ironic coming from the woman who is an apologist for an ideology that allows and encourages child marriage, and coming from the party of the three judges that were blocking the release of the files. And if you don’t believe me, just look up which three judges were blocking their release and look up who appointed them
You’re being purposely obtuse, she suggested he should be killed by saying he’s the leader of the pedophile party and that Somalia (where she’s from) executes pedophiles. She didn’t put a hit on him or publicly state “I hereby call for the execution of Trump.” Just like when Trump was suggesting Pelosi was a traitor followed by saying the penalty for treason is death. No he didn’t verbatim say she should be executed but only someone extremely stupid wouldn’t be able to put an implication
Saying, Ilhan Omar eludes to suggesting Trump should be executed, and then explaining what I explained would be completely accurate journalism. You’re trying to split hair to get around the fact that she suggested Trump should be executed. Yes the article was inaccurate for stating she called for his execution, it would have been accurate to say Omar implies or seemingly implies that Trump should be executed.
I’m a senior journalism student with a 3.5 GPA. Americans accepting misinformation and journalists forgetting their role is the exact reason I’m no longer going into media. “Somali leader suggests capital punishment for pedophiles, mentions Trump” is a way more accurate headline. If you disagree, I genuinely think we are screwed as a country
I’m not here to save face for anyone, I want the actual truth. If Trump is convicted of pedophilia then by all means throw the book at him. But until I see an actual conviction and/or actual proof beyond hearsay that was dismissed by Obama and Biden DOJs then it’s innocent until proven guilty.
You’re being insulted? How? Also, I’m not defending misinformation, you’re trying to brand something as misinformation that’s not. Or more accurately you’re branding something as misinformation for the wrong reason. She suggested Trump should be executed, just use simple geometric logic. Did she verbatim say “Trump should be executed,” no. They’re wrong with how they worded it, not wrong for saying she suggested he should be executed.
I wonder if you see the cognitive dissonance. You yourself know that the headline is inaccurate and a lie. Inaccurate information is misinformation if it is being blatantly used to deceive the public. Turning an implication into “this is a fact” is misinformation. With the high stakes in politics and the division in the U.S. right now, accuracy is extremely important
i did read them you fucking braindead troglodyte. 60% is 3/5 which means 2/5 of those adults (40%) were above 18-20 which is nearly HALF. "majority" ≠ "overwhelming majority" you absolute fucking dunce. stop trying to rely on ambiguous language to carry your stupid ass point again, idgaf about somalia. your dumbass comment about somalia permitting pedophilia is unique to neither somalia nor the us nor many developed nations. i care about my home country - the us - and the fact that we allow it
yeah she obv implied it, that isnt the issue. the issue is a government intentionally using misleading information. there's a HUGE difference between outright calling for the death of a person vs saying somalia executes pedos, and the headline was purposefully worded to increase outrage towards Omar.
I didn’t report anyone. Who here has been removed? I’ll wait. California, Washington and New Mexico are indisputably Democratic and they have no minimum age requirement. Maryland, Oregon and Nevada, which are indisputably Democratic have a 17 year old minimum. Virginia, Maine, New Hampshire, Colorado and Illinois which are indisputably Democratic have a 16 year old minimum. Hawaii which is indisputably Democratic has a 15 year minimum.
And did you hold that same logic for Trump is regard to Nancy Pelosi? No you did not, so you’re a hypocrite who doesn’t actually care about the truth. I believe in a consistent standard where people don’t stick their head in the sand regarding implications, with that being said it should be explicitly stated when something is an implication.
Hey dumbass. Read your own source. It says 67% (majority) were situations where the child was 17, and it says 60% (majority) were situations where the adult was 18-20. Therefore a majority fall into the 17-18/20 window. Especially given the fact that the percentages for 17, 16 and 15 and younger are much smaller and the percentages for 21-28 and 29+ are much smaller.