Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
We are the proletariat
upvote 5 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

No we’re not😂

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

What is that??

upvote 1 downvote
👋
Anonymous 1d

What is “proletariat”? It means something different when I look it up.

upvote 1 downvote
🦓
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

Depends what you mean by proletariat

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

In what ways are we not?

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

Well you don’t know who I am, so how can you know what class I belong to?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

I’m assuming we’re all earning degrees to become a part of the labor force but maybe I’m wrong and it’s a luxury item for you

upvote 6 downvote
🦓
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

Maybe #1 is using the traditional Marxian definition of proletariat which is the industrial working class

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 1d

I’m using the roman definition attached to the original phrase. Proles were a sub-class of plebs: “he who gives nothing to the state but his children.” Marx was a scholar of ancient philosophy and well educated in many aspects of antiquity. He obviously meant to invoke something more specific than “anyone who works a job” with the term.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

I’ve never known proletariat to mean “person who intends to have a job in the future” but maybe I’m not up to date

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1d

The working class

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

To Marx society was split between the Bourgeoisie (the owners of businesses, factories, land, etc) and the proletariat (those that worked the fields, the mines, the factories, the offices etc). It’s a less inherently oppressive definition than the original Latin

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

That’s not accurate. He predicted that the old feudal classes would disappear and be absorbed by those two classes. He never said that only two classes have ever existed. That is an absolutely awful misreading.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

It may be a bit simplistic but it’s not like it’s inaccurate.

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

You’ve obviously never read Marx. You’re confusing his historical predictions with the claim that only two classes have ever existed (which is absolutely ridiculous). I can show you examples right now of Marx writing about other classes. Do you want me to?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

Fewer than 40% of Americans hold a college degree and even fewer have the time and energy to argue about politics on here like we do. You guys are not "proles" or "disenfranchised working-class people" just because you can't afford a house. Chances are you're the children of the bourgeoisie, who just so happen to also hate the top 1%.

upvote 3 downvote
🦓
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

Nobody who’s 20 is expected to buy a house. That requires wealth accumulation

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

Are Jared Kushner and Donald Trump proles? They both attended college. Are CEOs and executives proles? They’re paid wages in exchange for managerial labor.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

If you’d like to sure. I’m aware he discussed other social classes as he worked to explain the nature of society throughout different eras of humanity

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

Oh so more than two classes have existed? Lmao that’s not what you said like 5 minutes ago.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

Yet we’re here on a politics page on a college chat app. Hence why I’m assuming we’re all working towards degrees. I don’t hate the 1%, I get that total equivalency is untenable. I hate that the system we have makes it possible for the top 1% to own equivalent wealth as the bottom 90% of society. I’m not going to blame people for wanting to maximize their social standing in our current system.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

In class last week we actually covered how prestigious private universities are used by elites as just another way to make connections

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1d

That’s a valid point yeah

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> curiouscavedweller 1d

You do not own capital and must sell your labour power to survive, specifically in the service of creating surplus value for capital

upvote 10 downvote
👋
Anonymous replying to -> #8 1d

I do own capital though?

upvote 1 downvote
👋
Anonymous replying to -> #8 1d

Technically I own several capitals? Nvm, I think something is being lost in translation. I’ll fix.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> curiouscavedweller 1d

What capital do you own?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> curiouscavedweller 1d

And is that primarily how you feed, clothe, and house yourself?

upvote 1 downvote
👋
Anonymous replying to -> #8 1d

No? They are rather troublesome. I am now certain something is being lost in translation.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> curiouscavedweller 1d

Is English not your first language?

upvote 1 downvote
👋
Anonymous replying to -> #8 1d

3rd language. I learned from watching American TV.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> curiouscavedweller 1d

What is your native language?

upvote 1 downvote