Anonymous #1 17h

how is this an excellent point lmfao

0

Anonymous #2 17h

Ok so you’re coming from a legal standpoint. What exactly in the 14th amendment approves abortion? Also, do you think morality factors into this debate at all?

0

Anonymous #3 17h

You care about eagles more than humans??

-1

Anonymous OP 17h

Fetuses are not human

3

Anonymous OP 17h

Abortion rights imo should be based in the due process clause, which prohibits the government from depriving any person of “liberty” without due process of law For nearly 50 years under Roe v. Wade, SCOTUS interpreted “liberty” to include a fundamental right to privacy. This privacy encompasses intimate personal decisions, including whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term.

3

Anonymous OP 17h

True liberty is impossible without bodily integrity, the absolute right to control your own physical body and medical decisions without government intrusion. I also think the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause should protect abortion, as restricting abortion targets women and pregnant individuals specifically, denying them the same social, economic, and physical autonomy enjoyed by men.

4

Anonymous OP 17h

It should be illegal to take eagle eggs and it should be illegal to take someone else's fetus. It should not be illegal for an eagle or a person to abort their own offspring.

0

Anonymous OP 17h

And yes, morality is central to my argument. It is fundamentally immoral to force a person to undergo the profound physical risks, pain, and life-altering consequences of pregnancy and childbirth against their will. Restricting abortion leads to measurable human suffering, including higher maternal mortality rates, increased poverty, and worse health outcomes for existing children. We should prioritize the health and survival of the living person.

3

Anonymous OP 17h

It’s simply ridiculous for the government to codify one specific religious doctrine into law for everyone.

3

Anonymous #5 17h

We’re not? I thought humanity was about to go extinct from global warming?

1

Anonymous #4 17h

And eagle eggs aren’t eagles

3

Anonymous OP 17h

So you do understand lmao

1

Anonymous #3 17h

Just using #4s logic

1

Anonymous OP 17h

And regardless, due to danger of extinction so we made it illegal to fuck with them. Humans, on the other hand, are not dying out right now

1

Anonymous #4 17h

It just confuses me how we give more rights to eagles than humans

0

Anonymous OP 17h

Does the law say eagles can't abort their own eggs?

1

Anonymous OP 17h

We give a lot of things more rights than humans. Corporations, for instance

6

Anonymous #2 17h

Shut up libby you support baby murder

0

Anonymous OP 16h

We give more rights to humans by allowing them to choose whether or not to go through their pregnancy

4

Anonymous #6 16h

About to go extinct is a stretch, plus even if that were the case, bald eagles would still be more endangered than humans

1

Anonymous #1 16h

Fetuses aren’t babies

3

Anonymous #6 15h

That was never the danger from global warming. Massive refugee crises doesn’t mean global endangerment of the species.

1