Anonymous #1 3w

You’re right! I’m a theistic satanist and MY religion should guide all the rules.

16

Anonymous OP 3w

Wrong

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

Imagine being a satanist 🤮

-3

Anonymous #1 3w

Ohhh so you don’t like it so much when it’s someone else’s religion. You think you’re a special little boy who has all the right answers and everyone should have to follow your rules. Very mature.

29

Anonymous #4 3w

Imagine sucking my balls

21

Anonymous #5 3w

I haven't even spoken in this conversation yet and I'm not a christian but the whole idea of satanism grosses me out

-4

Anonymous #4 3w

Yeah it’s not at all what you think it is. It’s not worshipping evil and sacrificing babies it’s like a whole different thing. I’d recommend doing actual research into it.

6

Anonymous #4 3w

I don’t know I feel like saying a religion grosses you out is fucked up no matter what it is?

15

Anonymous OP 3w

Not when your religion celebrates sin

-4

Anonymous #4 3w

You don’t know anything about my religion then? The satan from the Bible is not the one we worship? We have sins (false judgement, arrogance, and malice) but we don’t like celebrate the biblical sins we just see them as part of humanity (what we call the five appetites). We have what’s called ‘the infernal tenants’ (devotion, resilience, clarity, autonomy, and wisdom) which is what guides us

19

Anonymous OP 3w

Gross bro keep it to yourself

-3

Anonymous #4 3w

Ah yes, trying to prioritize resilience and wisdom and never have arrogance or malice is so gross.

15

Anonymous OP 3w

No, seeing sin as a part of humanity is gross

-4

Anonymous #4 3w

It literally is my guy. “I’m not a Christian but sinning is gross”

19

Anonymous OP 3w

I don't have to be Christian to think that things like raping kids and murder don't have to be inherent parts of humanity or be grossed out by the implication that they are

-2

Anonymous #4 3w

Those sins are not what I was talking about. Those fall under unforgivables and are never allowed. Harming other people without justification is never acceptable. The sins that are allowed are the ones that harm none, so things like the seven deadly sins.

11

Anonymous OP 3w

That just seems like some loophole so that you don't have to support stuff that is abhorrently bad but can still say sin (which if i understand normally encompasses stuff like rape and murder) is inherently linked to humanity

-2

Anonymous OP 3w

“The left hand path does not promote violence or malicious behavior, nor does it support those who bastardize its crafts for hateful ignorant agendas” -the infernal gospel

2

Anonymous #5 3w

Omg I loooove TIG it was written so well

2

Anonymous #4 3w

Yeah no. Like #5 said violence in any form or malicious behavior are seen as unforgivable and will lead to exile. “Sin” isn’t really a concept we have outside of the infernal sins of which there are only three.

4

Anonymous OP 3w

🤤

1

Anonymous #1 3w

Wanna make out

1

Anonymous #6 3w

John Adams's views are not a call for a theocracy or a concern about separating church and state in the modern sense.

15

Anonymous OP 3w

It was inconceivable at the time that America would not be moral and religious so it would’ve been unnecessary.

2

Anonymous #6 3w

Adams wasn’t calling for a theocracy. He meant republics need virtuous citizens, which at the time was synonymous with religious but as we all know definitions change as people get more information. The Constitution itself bars a state religion, so twisting his words into an argument for theocracy is ignoring both him and the First Amendment.

7

Anonymous OP 3w

His quote implies that it should be ignored without a religious society.

-2

Anonymous #6 3w

That’s not what Adams said. He was warning that without civic virtue, the Constitution can’t hold. In his day, virtue and religion were basically synonyms. But the Constitution itself makes clear government can’t enforce religion (First Amendment, Treaty of Tripoli, etc.) Using his quote to argue for a state religion is cherry picking while ignoring the actual law.

6

Anonymous #4 3w

“Seeing sin as a part of humanity is gross” bruh have you even heard of Christianity

8

Anonymous #4 3w

"seeing sin as a part of humanity is gross" Romans 3:9-19 Romans 3:10 Romans 3:23 The entire foundational concept of "original sin"

10

Anonymous #4 3w

rejecting the sinful nature of humankind is arguably blasphemous

2

Anonymous #7 3w

Nah not a Christian

1

Anonymous #3 3w

yeah ngl christians do that way more than muslims. and muslims aren’t supposed to be doing that according to the quran. it’s giving islamophobic

22

Anonymous #4 3w

okay well obviously they’re talking about sins found in abrahamic religions? it’s giving low reading comprehension because they’re obviously talking about sins that are minor compared to those. if you think things like fornication, greed, or gossip aren’t sin, that’s a personal, pagan belief and not representative of abrahamic faith, which like i said is obviously what’s being discussed

3

Anonymous #10 3w

Whos abraham

1

Anonymous #4 3w

I mean if you don’t like the idea that sin is intrinsically a part of human nature you’re not gonna like Christianity

1

Anonymous #7 3w

Cosin > sin

2