Anonymous #1 6d

it all goes back to Russia, autopen, or ballroom 💔

9

Anonymous #2 6d

the only evidence of such sentiment was a bullet engraved with a helldivers 2 reference. all the other bullets did not possess serious sentiment, I’m unsure why that one would:

1

Anonymous OP 6d

No mention of “hey fascist, catch?”

1

Anonymous #2 6d

that was the helldivers 2 reference lol

2

Anonymous OP 6d

it was allegedly followed by a sequence of arrows that perform a strike in the game.

1

Anonymous OP 6d

And why to you is it being found in a video game more important than the sentiment it’s expressing? You think it’s in there, but he didn’t agree with it?

1

Anonymous #2 6d

what indicated to you that it was a serious sentiment when the bullet that killed Kirk had a 4chan furry copypasta engraved on it?

1

Anonymous #2 6d

And then there’s also Bella ciao. And the testimony of his statements to his family about what he disliked about Kirk. We really don’t have to pretend this guy didn’t despise fascism. We can acknowledge it and improve the civil discourse of our party and hold the media accountable (should be done on both sides)

1

Anonymous #2 6d

Are you familiar with the prisoner’s dilemma?

1

Anonymous #2 6d

also 4chan roots to that haha. I don’t think this was politically motivated at all, personally. I think it was a chronically online loser doing it for the ‘lulz’

0

Anonymous OP 6d

The contextual clues. Testimony of his family. Yes there’s shitposting and nobody is denying that. But like dude lol. Did he kill him in an extremely targeted attack and agree with him? Be fr

0

Anonymous #2 6d

there’s been very little testimony of his family. right wingers of an extreme degree also detest Kirk. The testimony of his friend saying he was leftist was pulled after the friend redacted their statement. Apparently there’s some muddled stuff about the Kirk statement. I do firmly believe that if he was a radical leftist/anywhere but conservative we’d already know.

0

Anonymous OP 6d

Dude. A political talking head came to a campus that openly tried to prevent his coming. The shooter expressed to his family how he felt about Kirk. He then shot and killed ONLY Kirk, in a precision attack from range, before fleeing the scene. You’re delusional

0

Anonymous OP 6d

Dude this is the same shit Republicans did after the Minnesota legislators were killed in also very obviously targeted attacks. Please spare

0

Anonymous #2 6d

He wasn’t MAGA or leftist, just a terminally-online lunatic If he was really involved in leftist circles, he’d probably know not to say “if you read this, you’re gay lmao” bc that uses “gay” insultingly

1

Anonymous #2 6d

1) most campuses have a petition made by leftist students to attempt to prevent Kirk from coming 2) why would that matter? Robinson wasn’t attending school there 3) I don’t think leftists can shoot like that bro. 4) I don’t think you’re chronically online enough to know the insane beef between right wingers

1

Anonymous #1 6d

Worst argument yet my god dude that’s literally just shit posting

1

Anonymous #1 6d

generally my thought process at the moment as well. chronically online loser disconnected from reality.

1

Anonymous OP 6d

All the mental loopholes you’re going through. The situation in Utah was worse than typical. Hell, Kirk even came out and acknowledged it prior to his coming. Why he didn’t get additional security I’m not sure. And yes. He drove 3 hours to kill one person in a crowd of 3,000 who was known for nothing but being a political talking head

0

Anonymous #2 6d

Lol i don’t think leftists sh*t-post like that. Either way, doesn’t reflect on either party, TR was just a lunatic with wayyy too much screentime

4

Anonymous #2 6d

what loopholes? which point of mine was incorrect? even my red state conservative college had a petition to prevent Kirk from coming lol

1

Anonymous #1 6d

^ i take that back, this guy shouldn’t have the honor of me referring to them via initials

3

Anonymous OP 6d

Alright man yall are ridiculous. You’re taking all the gymnastics in the world. It will come out in due time when he decides to cooperate and his family says more.

0

Anonymous #2 6d

No better than the trumpers blaming Walz after the Minnesota incidents. Here I was thinking stupid unfounded fucking conspiracy deflection was not a thing the left would do

0

Anonymous #2 6d

What do you want us to say? Whatever his political leaning, it was an evil thing to do and shows how political rhetoric needs to cool down

4

Anonymous #1 6d

Idk what more you want other than that. I’m not defending this guy, and I’m not placing responsibility anywhere else but at his feet

3

Anonymous #1 6d

The left is actively justifying and deflecting from this and it’s making me sick. The proper and just approach is to acknowledge it and step back from divisive rhetoric on both sides. Political violence is getting out of hand. If nobody takes any blame ever, it’s going to get worse

-1

Anonymous #2 6d

nah man I agree we’ll see more come out. the difference is that I’m not blaming any singular party/individual lol. Maybe 4chan?

1

Anonymous #2 6d

the blame is on the lone gunman and him alone lol. Kirk’s been at this for 10+ years- never seen a leftist do this. even if he was a leftist, what does that change? most violence of this caliber is done by right wingers.

1

Anonymous #2 6d

Not defending anyone, but i doubt folks on the left would be willing to single-handedly take blame for political violence when folks on the right joke about it just as much, if not more (ex: paul pelosi, mn legislators, initial reactions from maga on kirk) If blame is to go around, both sides will need to take it

10

Anonymous OP 6d

Gunmen can’t be isolated from the society and political climate they operate in. Political violence is on the rise for a reason

0

Anonymous #1 6d

And I agree. This is a problem from both sides. Partisan media needs to be held accountable and the divisive rhetoric needs to stop. Starts with the Pres

0

Anonymous #2 6d

like the school shooter from the same day who had notably conservative ideology? or hortman’s murderer from a few months ago? the overwhelming amount of violence perpetrated by right wingers? now your true colors are kinda showing if you want all leftists to take the blame for the unknown motives of a single act of violence against a conservative lol.

6

Anonymous #2 5d

small issue… there’s no engravings on the bullets. it’s been days and we’ve had no visual proof of their existence. and it was only mentioned after the previous argument for why it was a leftist was debunked. they blatantly made it up. all actual evidence points to this being a neo nazi. why do you think Nick Fuentes has been freaking out all week?

1

Anonymous #2 5d

Charlie Kirk was an advocate for mass scale political violence. He called for the genocide of gay people.

1