Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Love how you guys just spout “disobey illegal orders” like it means anything It’s not up to the individual enlisted member to determine that. Bro isn’t going to risk a court martial bc some online leftist would think it’s cool
THIS ISNT A DILEMMA YOU FUCKING IDIOTS YOU AS A MEMBER OF THE MILITARY ARE OBLIGATED TO DISOBEY ILLEGAL ORDERS I HATE MODERN JOURNALISM
link

Trump threats cause dilemma for US officers: disobey orders or commit war crimes

www.theguardian.com

upvote -4 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Cool, following illegal rules because you were “just doing your job” is still a war crime

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Did we learn nothing from Nuremberg? The whole “i was just following orders” shit isn’t a justification

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Little known fact apparently but it actually is up to the individual soldier to disobey any order they believe is illegal!

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Well ig it’ll depend on each service members willingness to murder civilians. We’ll have to see what happens.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1d

orders* but point still stands

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1d

That would require OP to know wtf they’re talking abt, and they don’t

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1d

The 34 people found in trouble for the entire Holocaust? Pretty sure there were more Nazis than that.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1d

You probably can’t even coherently defend a war crime outside of “an armed operation I personally disagree with”

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

Found a child left behind. Those were KEY leaders dude. Fucking brainlet

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

My brother in christ, why would I “defend a war crime” when I’m quite literally arguing against them by saying that jus following someone else’s order doesn’t absolve you from them? Maybe you gotta learn to be coherent 💀

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

“In all, 199 defendants were tried, 161 were convicted, and 37 were sentenced to death” - National WWII museum It’s ok, you were ONLY 124 PEOPLE OFF

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

They don't have to because war crimes are explicitly spelled out and every service member is educated on them.

upvote 10 downvote