Anonymous #3 1w

No one on this app was even double digits when that article was written

52

Anonymous #3 1w

Be better than trump at it🙄

5

Anonymous #3 1w

How are you taking the epitome of “both-sides have a point” at face value? Nobody wants the neoliberal drone strike high scorer back filling the cabinet with banking executives who caused the 08 recession.

27

Anonymous #3 1w

2012 😭

7

Anonymous #3 1w

Dogshit crop job so I looked it up lmfao holy shit it’s a comedian’s article about how Dems were pissed at Obama

12

Anonymous #7 1w

wait how tf did I not see the Goldman Sachs ad 😭

8

Anonymous #3 1w

Like holy fuck dude you cut out everything but the headline and banner ad at the top. How the hell are you in college

26

Anonymous #1 1w

They’ve learned to plan 3 steps ahead. They’ll have his replacement handpicked and primed to keep pushing project 2025. Assuming they don’t know exactly what they’re doing has been our downfall

46

Anonymous #8 1w

I (leftist trash) have an unpopular opinion. The person filling in for the Tangerine Fascist will never be as cunning as him. You think Couch-Fucker has the same gumption? No. DJT will have his own textbook on populism one day. No American rightwinger comes close.

7

Anonymous #5 1w

as another leftist you’re not alone in that thought. It’s a cult of personality and nobody else quite has the sauce

12

Anonymous #7 1w

You’re surprised a rightwing glazer tried to deceive people?

19

Anonymous #3 1w

Bro one of the first things we’re taught in school is that articles over ten years old are UNRELIABLE due to the constant influx of new information. Plus, it’s an opinion article 😭

9

Anonymous #5 1w

No I’m just disappointed they didn’t do a better job

7

Anonymous OP 1w

Yeah as a history major, things don’t lose relevance just because it’s an older article. We literally use articles decades old to picture the zeitgeist of the time. Like it or not 14 years ago liberals praised Obama

-5

Anonymous #3 1w

L ragebait

1

Anonymous OP 1w

I disagree with the fact that it’s unreliable just because it’s old. But it’s written by a comedian lmao, 3 cannot be serious

1

Anonymous #3 1w

You went headline fishing 😭

1

Anonymous #15 1w

There wasn’t a term limit for the president when he was alive

27

Anonymous #3 1w

“Erm as a history major” 🤓☝️ be so fr bro a lot of us on here were like 10 not even during his presidency and I don’t recall Obama literally ignoring Congress and creating 2 of the largest government shutdowns in history and trying to make sure Americans can’t afford healthcare and fucking over our farmers, MY family of farmers. Trump is ruining this country and yes Obama did bad shit too but he wasn’t blatantly saying he was going to kill people that had drugs coming into this country-

1

Anonymous #18 1w

Instead of just arresting them

1

Anonymous #15 1w

This is so crazy to say 😭😭 please educate yourself on when the two term presidency became law 😭

15

Anonymous #15 1w

Really not disproving the fact that republicans are less educated on average

11

Anonymous #11 1w

They aren’t spending that money though, private donors are, mainly companies who don’t care who’s in office

0

Anonymous #1 1w

It’s ragebait. Trump has already said he’s not gonna run again

1

Anonymous #11 1w

Plus Trump has already said he’s not running again, you’re getting ragebaited by a congressman

0

Anonymous #20 1w

Some of those companies absolutely care who’s in office. Amazon and some others were going to get torn up by Biden’s FTC, and possibly Harris’, if she kept Lina Khan. Others are just donating this money because they have to suck up in case they have business in front of a federal agency soon

6

Anonymous #19 1w

Doesn’t change the fact that he did more than two terms. Also he majorly broke precedent and was seen as a dictator

-2

Anonymous #20 1w

Yeah dude I’m sure Lockheed Martin is chipping in a few bands out of the kindness of their hearts

5

Anonymous #15 1w

It’s almost like people claiming no terms was a path towards dictatorship had a point and that an amendment was made after WWII to prevent such a thing from ever happening again

1

Anonymous #6 1w

I agree I don’t like what Trump is doing. My point is Democrats celebrate a man who also acted like a dictator

0

Anonymous #15 1w

Yeah dude, I’m sure all the people who voted for FDR in 1940 are going to feel like hypocrites after seeing your comment. All 200 of them who are still alive and coherent enough

2

Anonymous #20 1w

No one in federal government should be “ragebaiting.” Deeply unprofessional.

3

Anonymous #6 1w

Wait I almost forgot the voting age back in 1940 was 21 still. So you’re literally getting mad at people who are AT MINIMUM the age of 106 in 2025 lmaooooo

6

Anonymous #15 1w

How did FDR act like a dictator?

1