Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Deep state news is portraying “ICE agents maybe don’t have to have a judicial warrant” as an alternative legal theory, not obvious and entirely illegal (which it is)
link

Video: Does ICE Need a Warrant to Enter Your Home?

www.nytimes.com

upvote 18 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

“Up until now they were trained they had to have a judicial warrant” yeah because that’s in the fucking constitution . How can the reporter just not say “this is illegal”

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

It’s hard to tell because DHS’ memo doesn’t actually state the legal basis for their decision. What they’re rolling back is their own policy and guidelines. It looks like court cases about this are mixed. Thus, this is probably going to get sued over. Already, districts in CA and MN have ruled that this isn’t allowed, but a district in TX has ruled that it’s ok. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/can-ice-enter-a-home-to-make-an-arrest-with-only-an-administrative-warrant

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

The relevant cases are: - Abel (1960), SCOTUS did not want to consider whether admin warrant was sufficient - Coolidge and Shadwick (1971 and 1972), SCOTUS said “issuing magistrate must be neutral and detached” - Malagerio (2021), NDTX basically said Abel might support using admin warrants, and defendant didn’t argue otherwise. 5th circuit affirmed but didn’t rule on the admin warrants

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

- Payton (1980), SCOTUS says “judicial officer” needs to go between “zealous officer and the citizen” - Kidd (2024), CDCA cites Payton and says admin warrant is insufficient

upvote 1 downvote