
But like, for the sake of argument suppose Donald Trump was the “enforcer” that would hire hit men to take out anyone who talked. It’d explain why Epstein died in prison. And why giuffre “committed suicide” and why she’d “lie” about Trump. (She specifically talked about his demeanor and politeness, not if he ever violated her or anything)
Now you could also make a claim he was an informant and trying to help her out under the guise to Epstein he was part of the cohort. Regardless, that information needs to come out to make a conclusion. Yet we still only have crumbs of evidence. Not the mountain. Why is that, do you think?
For the sake of honest debate, the court of public opinion has a far lower standard of proof than the actual court of law. Someone can be innocent legally but still considered guilty by all of America. That’d be a disaster for his political ambitions. That said I 100% believe he’s guilty, just won’t actually cave into claiming it until we get the actual evidence not these breadcrumbs they’re drip feeding us
Hey bud? The mistakes aren’t really the same. Social media is informal so there’s a lot of uncapitalized letters where there should be capital letters, it’s just how some people type. However, mixing up they’re, there, or their (or you’re/your) is always going to be commented on because it throws anyone off who’s reading the sentence. A lot of people’s posts and comments are going to have grammatical errors, but if you don’t want to get constant corrections, you’ve gotta learn the words.