Anonymous #1 6d

Ofc a Charlie fan doesn’t have any grammar skills

49

Anonymous OP 6d

They’re* now respond to it

-11

Anonymous #1 6d

In the context is saying that prominent black women lacked the brain processing power to be taken seriously okay to do?

37

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6d

In what context***

24

Anonymous #1 6d

I agree, it is annoying when quotes are taken out of context. Though I will say our current administration does the same. So, I personally don’t see why it’s such a bad thing when the people in power have already set the precedent that it’s okay to take peoples’ quotes out of context.

15

Anonymous #1 6d

I fear that if there are dozens of examples of “out of context” quotes from a single person, and they all sound equally horrendous and extreme, it may not just be out of context anymore.

27

Anonymous #1 6d

I posted quotes, explain the context

6

Anonymous #3 6d

Nooooo you didn’t post the part where he wasn’t a bigot after he was a bigot! That’s out of context.

14

Anonymous #6 6d

I posted a bunch of quotes. Go ahead and explain the context of them right now

8

Anonymous #3 6d

I posted it. Go compare 😁

-2

Anonymous #6 6d

None of those actually defend the quotes above and even still don’t even fully defend the things they are defending. Some of which just make their own false claims, “reverse discrimination” bsffr

8

Anonymous #6 6d

Here’s more quotes for you if you wanna explain contexts

19

Anonymous #6 6d

One of my quotes was him promoting the great replacement theory. A white nationalist talking point about how America is less white and apparently that’s evil, do you think that people have mixed kids is bad?

12

Anonymous #6 6d

I did and clearly you didn’t read what I posted cause they don’t address any of them lol

10

Anonymous #6 6d

Also the font is sooooo small dude

6

Anonymous #3 6d

It’s not my job to teach you. unfortunately I could explain all of them to you with the context and why they are not what you’re making them out to be but you still wouldn’t listen because you are set in your ways and don’t actually care. You listen to respond, not to learn

-1

Anonymous #1 6d

“It’s out of context” bro explain why Kirk said “they wanna see this country collapse. They want to see it less white” -Kirk. Don’t dodge around it cause you can’t defend it. Why does less white = societal collapse

8

Anonymous #1 6d

All of the sudden it’s DOZENS of quotes out of context. Stfu you racist bitch

4

Anonymous #1 6d

“It’s out of context” is among the weakest defenses imaginable when it’s on its own. Without explaining the context, all it seems to do is deflect and make the speaker look foolish

8

Anonymous #7 6d

Well when you speak for a living about controversial topics, you’ve bound to wind up with a good amount of quotes that can be taken out of context. Also, why the anger and name calling? Seems counterproductive

1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6d

I’m not going to sit here and put all those quotes into context, especially because at the end of the day I know you wouldn’t care if I did put them into context because you’re stuck on your imaginary moral highground. if you want to call it deflection, I guess I’m deflecting the responsibility away from myself to teach you the context. I’ve seen all the context, so I know the quotes are rooted in real talking points and good faith for all people that make sense and they aren’t racist nonsense.

1

Anonymous #3 6d

The country being pushed to be less white is totally different than the country becoming less white because of minority excellence. If the country was becoming less white because of minority excellence Kirk would have applauded and had no issue with it. The problem is we’re being pushed to be less white and spots to be filled by under qualified people just because of their skin color, which would probably equal societal collapse because turns out you need qualified people to run a large country.

1

Anonymous #1 6d

Bro cares a lot about his white excellence theory

1

Anonymous #5 6d

Like I just said to the other person, turns out when you talk politics and controversial topics for a living, you wind up with a fair number of out of context quotes.

0

Anonymous #4 6d

2 wrongs don’t make a right. Call people out for out of context quotes, BUT if you do that, you better not start taking quotes out of context to fit your narrative, because in that case, literally what is happening right here, they are no better than the people they claim to be so much better than.

1

Anonymous OP 6d

Nah, just care about qualified excellence. Like I’ve said, listen to understand, not to respond.

1

Anonymous #1 6d

Bro go to sleep

0

Anonymous #1 5d

No. He did not always express concerns about America becoming "less white" when discussing DEI. You are oh for one in providing valuable context of Charlie’s quotes. Random ad hoc justifications that are completely free of any textual evidence are not what "context" means.

0

Anonymous #6 5d

This doesn’t debunk or explain anything. It just constantly says that quotes that he said or controversy he was in doesn’t exist.

1

Anonymous #3 5d

“But I think it’s worth it. I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment,” “I can’t stand the word empathy, actually, I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that does a lot of damage.” “If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, ‘Boy, I hope he’s qualified.’” 1/2

1

Anonymous #9 5d

…he ultimately misquoted a mixture of passages from Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13. He said, “Thou shall lay with another man, shall be stoned to death. Just saying... The chapter...affirms God’s perfect law when it comes to sexual matter. “…I’m going to say something very provocative. I’m not a fan of retirement. I don’t think retirement is biblical” https://www.huffpost.com/entry/charlie-kirk-quotes-beliefs_n_68c448c1e4b0b3dca95e9cd0 2/2

1

Anonymous #8 5d

You said nothing of any substance there. I am literally explaining exactly what he said just without the quotes because honestly it’s impossible to do the research right now, but I have seen the full clip before and understood exactly what he was saying, I just can’t word for word quote it right now because I can’t find it, and I’m not scrolling thru 10 pages of google results to make a response that you’re not going to care about anyway.

0

Anonymous OP 5d

Sounds like you’re out of points

1

Anonymous #1 5d

You don’t even have to give Kirk’s reasoning for what he said. Give me *A* hypothetical context where saying that prominent black women lacked the brain processing power to be taken seriously.

1

Anonymous #1 5d

The Great Replacement theory that Charlie Kirk had been quite open about defending is the notion that the Jews, the Dems, or the conspiratorial "they" is actively trying to grow the population of other ethnicities through immigration to dilute the whiteness of America or drive the white race to extinction. Charlie Kirk believes this. He has affirmed this multiple times. It does not necessarily have anything to do with hiring underqualified people due to their race, as you implied.

1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 5d

*wasn’t a dogshit take. I ended my sentence too early mb.

1

Anonymous #8 5d

There’s definitely people in power that are trying to do that, the DNC chair election in February definitely had some candidates that align with wanting to do that. I’ll have to look into it more at some point because I honestly don’t know much about the great replacement theory but just from what you said there, I can think of some radicals in positions of power I’ve seen talk that would definitely want that.

0

Anonymous #8 5d

I think I’m done here honestly I’ve had my large dose of politics in the last week, my main point in all this talking is to try to change peoples mind about his death being a good thing, I don’t care that you don’t agree with him. different strokes for different folks. But I think this celebration of a man being assassinated for his opinion is deeply concerning and we need to at least understand that his opinions weren’t what people are making them out to be. Best of luck to all in the comments.

-1

Anonymous #1 5d

No. There have been no attacks on the white race. The OG Nazis of mid-twentieth century Germany used the same talking points with respect the Aryans being threatened by the Jews. It is a quintessential fascist talking point, and it leads to genocide. They are lies, and these misinformed fears of yours are dangerous. You should not be able to write your own manifesto reminiscent of Mein Kampf just out of your own thoughts.

1

Anonymous #8 5d

As a white man I don’t see how other white men just fear not being a majority, it’s an insanely irrational fear.

3

Anonymous #1 5d

His "opinions" absolutely are what people make them out to be lol. And if you think that they even remotely justify his death, then you should stop acting as if speaking one’s mind is a trivial reason for his death. I won’t actively justify the shooting itself or celebrate his death, but IF anyone deserved it, Charlie did more than many others.

0