Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Why are men making decisions about something they will never physically and mentally go through? Women should be making decisions about women’s health.
upvote 14 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

People are able to reason about things that they have not personally experienced but sure.

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

That’s great for like do debate class. Not for making the actual laws final say about it

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

Nope. Not for making real laws that affect women. Nice try tho

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

Yes. We can reason about things that don't align with our own identity. It'm all for more women being in government but i don't like this argument that men are unable to consider the issues involved because they are men.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

“Consider” is not what they’re doing. They’re writing and passing legislation not “considering” a philosophical argument

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

If there was a men’s mental health meeting and every single person in the room was a woman… you’d throw a fucking fit too.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

They’re not considering anything you dumbfuck.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

Regarding men’s mental health, would you be fine with only women coming up with policies and laws? No you wouldn’t be.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

There's really no such thing as "men's mental health." Anyone who talks about that is a misogynist. But yes women can be therapists, psychologists, representatives, senators, and deal with mental health issues.

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

If they knew what they were talking about sure. What’s your line-up?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

The people who write laws can consider the relevant issues. Like when life begins, when personhood begins, the mother's freedom and bodily autonomy, society's interest in preventing murder past a certain point. No one on the supreme court when they decided roe v wade was a woman. So it's not an identity contest. It just takes some drilling down to the philosophical issues at the root of the conflict. That being said absolutely more women should be involved.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

sure, people can have immense empathy & understanding for someone else’s experience, but not without LISTENING to said people & involving them in discussions.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

they aren’t affected by it the same way and yet when decisions about women’s bodies are made the room is all men. this isn’t some kind of hypothetical or abstract this is a real thing that’s happening where women are not being allowed to make choices about their bodies and their voices aren’t being heard when those decisions are made

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

Oh shut up.

upvote 2 downvote