Anonymous #5 1w

yea

-3

Anonymous #6 1w

okay, they don’t, they just want to make sure that people have the freedom and access to gender affirming care if they want it

9

Anonymous #5 1w

Including kids?

-3

Anonymous #6 1w

Their parents and doctors can help the child decide. Not Jim Jordan or Mitch McConnell

10

Anonymous #6 1w

yes, children should have access to gender affirming care with extensive therapy to determine if that is the right course of action, the most gender affirming care that children get are just puberty blockers which only postpone puberty. if the child decides that they do not want to go through with hormone replacement therapy they can just stop the puberty blockers

9

Anonymous #5 1w

Yea you see its shit like this that gives me the impression you want everyone and everything to be trans

-2

Anonymous #5 1w

If it were actually about the choice of adults to live the way they want you wouldn't feel the need to involve literal children

-2

Anonymous #6 1w

“children should have access if they WANT” “you want everybody to be transgender” where’s the throughline

7

Anonymous #6 1w

gender dysphoria is a condition that affects people of all ages

8

Anonymous #6 1w

Transitioning is a choice, being trans is not.

3

Anonymous #5 1w

Its like saying kids should have access to drugs guns and fast cars "if they want"

-2

Anonymous #6 1w

Guns aren't prescribed by doctors

8

Anonymous #1 1w

Drugs are

-1

Anonymous #6 1w

is access to drugs, guns, and fast cars the medical consensus for children with gender dysphoria?

4

Anonymous #6 1w

So you do understand the difference!

6

Anonymous #5 1w

That along with taking away the phone might actually make them normal

-2

Anonymous #6 1w

But they do have access to drugs guns and fast cars

6

Anonymous #7 1w

Fossil fuels were a huge innovation. They massively decreased poverty and saved whales from extinction.

-1

Anonymous #8 1w

And now they're killing marine life and exacerbating wealth inequality!

7

Anonymous #3 1w

Technological innovation and cautious policy change are not in conflict

-2

Anonymous #1 1w

They’re still alleviating poverty actually. Cheap energy tends to do that.

-3

Anonymous #8 1w

People in poverty are going to be most affected by pollution

11

Anonymous #6 1w

bro falls for propaganda everyday when he walks outside because you have NO. capacity to think for yourself. being okay with someone feeling closer to another gender which has nothing to do with biological sex as they are two different things dumbass, is not wanting someone to. me personally i’d hope my kid doesn’t suffer from gender dysmorphia as they’d be subject to idiots like you making their life harder, but i’d love them just the same.

3

Anonymous #8 1w

what if the “cautious policy change” is gutting anyone’s hopes and dreams of having scientific research jobs, defunding NASA, and halting green energy projects

6

Anonymous #1 1w

They’re already the most effected by high energy prices. Pollution is a secondary concern after making sure you aren’t starving and have adequate shelter.

-1

Anonymous #3 1w

Most technological innovation comes from the private sector. NASA’s funding has been steadily reduced since the mid 1960’s and we visit space much more often today.

-3

Anonymous #8 1w

A high estimate puts to 40-50% of basic research comes from academia. No shit the products themselves come from the private sector but the basic research that goes into applied products is absolutely funded for by the public and government

12

Anonymous #4 1w

Nvm 44% is the median estimate, I’m more correct than I thought

16

Anonymous #8 1w

“Most technical innovation comes from the private sector” 🤡 who invented the internet, the encryption used by most technologies today, and touch screens?

8

Anonymous #8 1w

Most technological innovation is coming from the Chinese sector now

7

Anonymous #8 1w

Coal is currently at a net loss in terms of profit, it would literally be better for everyone (except the people in charge) to switch to renewables

4

Anonymous #6 1w

Ik im late but saying you’d rather let no kids ever have medication cus you don’t want some of them to be happy as themselves is wild

1

Anonymous #11 1w

If coal isn’t profitable, why would it be beneficial for the people in charge to continue mining it?

0