
Also the thing about copper in North America is trueish. North America has a very old tradition of copper use due to pure deposits around the Great Lakes. BUT they were hammering copper not smelting it. Because it was so pure there was no need to smelt and this also meant alloying never locally developed so you never got bronze around the Great Lakes. Copper tool use declined due to a shift towards it being for ceremonial items and due to greater availability of hard stones.
Copper just isn’t that great for tools. Like it’s useable but if you have access to high quality stone copper is about the same or worse in comparison. So once trade networks brought good stones from farther away, it became more economical to use copper, which was increasingly a status symbol, for jewelry or decorative plates or other high-status items.
In Eurasia and in Mesoamerica they didn’t have much pure copper, so in order to extract it they learned to smelt. Smelting enabled the accidental discovery of alloys, which is how Mesoamerica and Eurasia got bronze. Bronze is harder than pure copper so is therefore more useful compared to stone.