Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Hold tf up: Proto-Indo-European was a language spoken only 8000 years ago or so, and started with a group from modern day… Ukraine 😳 Like 95% of European, Persian, and northern Indian languages descend from this. Meaning Ukraine ruled the world once 🤯
upvote 17 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

Also, while Ukraine was dominating the world with their newly upgraded “horse” technology, people in the Americas were smelting copper

post
upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

I mean actually proto-indo-European is more like 5,500 years old and ENTERED Ukraine from the east with the arrival of the yamnaya culture. It’s more likely to have originated just above the Caucasus in what is now Russia.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

Common Ukraine w

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

Also the thing about copper in North America is trueish. North America has a very old tradition of copper use due to pure deposits around the Great Lakes. BUT they were hammering copper not smelting it. Because it was so pure there was no need to smelt and this also meant alloying never locally developed so you never got bronze around the Great Lakes. Copper tool use declined due to a shift towards it being for ceremonial items and due to greater availability of hard stones.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

Do look up the cucuteni-trypallia culture though they’re cool. A very large settled society in what is now the Moldova-Ukraine-Romania area which were there when the yamnaya arrived and mixed with them. Some of the largest cities on earth at the time.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

Ohmy b I thought the Yamnaya were originally from the Sea of Azov area probably a little too far north west

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

Do we know what caused the shift away from tool use? Was the high purity of the native deposits a hindrance in the material properties or smn?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Copper just isn’t that great for tools. Like it’s useable but if you have access to high quality stone copper is about the same or worse in comparison. So once trade networks brought good stones from farther away, it became more economical to use copper, which was increasingly a status symbol, for jewelry or decorative plates or other high-status items.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

In Eurasia and in Mesoamerica they didn’t have much pure copper, so in order to extract it they learned to smelt. Smelting enabled the accidental discovery of alloys, which is how Mesoamerica and Eurasia got bronze. Bronze is harder than pure copper so is therefore more useful compared to stone.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

So while copper use was discovered in North America at about the same time as in Eurasia, Eurasia ended up developing bronzes while North America didn’t. And the development of smelting in Eurasia would enable the later discovery of iron.

upvote 2 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

They weren’t smelting they had natural access to pure copper so they just hammered it into form

upvote 1 downvote