Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Why are republicans so obsessed with bodies that aren’t theirs? They wanna control what women and trans people do with their body. Like the obsession is so gross and weird stop trying to insert yourself into other people’s bodily health.
upvote 19 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 16w

Idk how many times you need to hear this, a baby is not part of a woman’s body. The only time we care abt someone else’s body is when other peoples safety or freedoms are at stake.

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

It’s not a fucking baby bro. It’s more of a parasite than a baby at the stage most abortions happen.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

A very concerning and dark view of human life and development. Honestly a ridiculous take. Biology has disproven this opinion time and time again.

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

It has no moral value, and it is inside a woman she should be able to do what she wants with it.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

Yeah. No. Location or age does not determine value of life.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

Biology does not call it a baby. And because it cannot suffer or experience life it has no value to me

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

That’s just ur opinion, we ain’t ever gonna agree.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

What does biology call it?

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

A zygote

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

So someone who is a mental vegetable or in a coma has no value to you either correct?

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

Lol what made you come to that conclusion

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

Which is? An early stage in human development no? It seems like you don’t know what ur talking about, but just want to be able to hate unborn children and justify the evil in your heart.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

You said “someone that cannot suffer or experience life” so it has no value. Someone who is a vegetable or in a coma cannot experience life or suffering either. So logically, with your point of view, they wouldn’t have any value either.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

It’s not a “baby” yall just say that to try and make it seem sadder. I don’t hate them. I just don’t wanna be forced to have a child if I get accidentally pregnant because I care about my well being. You’ll call me selfish but I don’t care. I can make a new zygote when im ready.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

The difference is that they have already experienced a life. It should be up to the family whether or not to pull life support just as it should be up to the woman whether or not to have an abortion

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

The loss of life at any stage is an extremely sad. If you’re worried about getting accidentally pregnant, don’t do things to get pregnant. Crazy how biology works. Your convenience is not worth the life of a child. Sorry. If you’re not ready to have a child, don’t have sex. Otherwise own up to the responsibility of your actions.

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

No. Someone who is born a vegetable has no experience of life. And what does that even mean? “Experience of life.” It’s extremely subjective and different for every single person. It’s a very inconsistent way to judge the value of life.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

Crazy take, that just tells me you want to control women’s sex lives.. Contraception fails all the time and it’s no one’s fault. Why do you want babies to brought into the world just to live hard lives with garbage parents? It’s humane to abort it if it’s just gonna grow up abused or in a family with no money to care for it. Why wouldn’t you rather people have kids when they can actually support them? Your view seems inhumane.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

If they were born a vegetable, yeah pull the plug tbh. No value to that life

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

No I don’t. Do what you want. But you don’t get to end someone else’s life bc it’s inconvenient for you to own up and be responsible. What you’re telling me, is that we should kill people and abort babies if we think they MAY have difficult lives. That means if their parents are poor, if they’re dad left, if they’re a minority, etc. Should we just start killing these people off bc we think they MAY have difficulties in life?? Your moral views are baseless and inconsistent.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

The FIRST right in the bill of rights is the right to LIFE. The government should protect people’s rights, life being the first one; which you want to take away based on your convenience.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

Again terrible and baseless morality. All human life is valuable.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

I don’t think abortion is murder and I never will. It’s not selfish it is responsible. No we shouldn’t kill people but abortion is not a person so idc. It’s about preventing suffering for all people involved.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

Abortion is nothing but a safe gynecological procedure and half the women u know have probably had one.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

You’re not gonna be able to convince me that a fetus/zygote is valuable. It’s replaceable and is not sentient just cause it’s a human doesn’t give it inherent value

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

You are refusing to acknowledge the humanity of someone who’s existence is inconvenient for you. Just as ppl have to just slavery and genocide.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

Just my opinion.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

I would say the same thing to half the women I know if it were true.

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

It’s not “someone.” It’s not a baby.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

Fetus means offspring. Try again. It’s just a word to make a baby sound less human but still means the same thing

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

It’s inconsistent and incorrect.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

What is in there then? A dog? A cat? A goat? What is it?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

Fetus=inside womb baby=outside womb.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

Cells.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

Ohhh my lord. So now we have reached the truth. You support full term abortion? And you seem to think location determines the value of human life. You are lost.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

You are cells. I am cells. What is your point.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

Absolutely not lol. Talking about early term.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

How many people say “ aww we have a fetus”. No. They’re carrying a baby. What is wrong with you. Selfishness has completely twisted your mind and destroyed your morality.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

We are much more than just cells. A zygote is really not more than just cells.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

You’re not gonna change my mind sorry. Zygote has no value to me.

upvote 9 downvote
🌊
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

Have you ever consider someone may call a single cell a baby?

upvote 8 downvote
🌊
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

Smh

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

No value for human life.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

It seems no human has any value to you

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

Not a zygote, no.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

You said we are all just cells.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

You can literally just make another one

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16w

No. You. Cannot. Every single human being is unique from conception.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

So? You can still make another one

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

It’ll be just as unique

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

No I didn’t you said that lol

upvote 5 downvote
🌊
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

I think people are different than a fetus in most cases bc the cells come together holistically to make a unique conscious person with their own ability to have a subjective view of the world. Even though we’re all made of cells a fetus cants do that until like 20ish weeks in.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

Biologist here. You’re so fucking wrong it’s hilarious 😂 if you call a fetus a baby in the biology community you will be the laughingstock and then no one would ever trust your research again. “What does biology call it?” Op was right it’s a zygote

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

life and personhood are two very distinct states of being. a fetus isn't a person and doesn't deserve the rights of one. doesn't matter tho cuz at the end of the day the real argument being had is whether or not pregnant people should have authority over their bodies and reproductive systems; which is an obvious "yes, of course" to anybody who isn't a freak with archaic beliefs about bodily autonomy

upvote 2 downvote