Anonymous #1 1d

It’s not, but the logic across both cases absolutely is. Not that difficult to grasp

4

Anonymous #2 21h

Robbers also walk away with your stuff and leave you alone they don’t take you. Also, they sure fucking do fight back when it’s their whole life: their house, their land, their livelihood, where their family’s are buried, and of course, when the alternative is living under a tyrannical regime.

3

Anonymous #3 21h

I’m not saying they should give up, but they have a right to make that choice themselves.

1

Anonymous #2 21h

And they are? But calling their president evil for not just rolling over at the sight of an oncoming occupying force is ludacris.

5

Anonymous #3 21h

If surrendering is what’s best for his people and would mean fewer deaths, less destruction, and less suffering from the war, then Zelenskyy needs to put his ego aside and wave the white flag. It’s not ludicrous

1

Anonymous #1 21h

He is not fighting for ego. He’s fighting for his people. Waving a white flag and surrendering to Russia would mean surrendering them to Russia and have you seen anything that has to do with Russia that isn’t Russian propaganda. Also, do you really want Russia to have access to Chernobyl? Even if they’re not going to do anything nefarious with it, they’re not gonna keep it up and not keeping Chernobyl could have devastating consequences for the rest of the world.

1

Anonymous #3 21h

And what would actually be so bad about Russian occupation? Russia and Ukraine already share a lot of cultural similarities, from their people and food to their history.

1

Anonymous #3 21h

I didn’t?

1

Anonymous #3 21h

Who gives a fuck about Chernobyl lol? Russia already have nuclear weapons and facilities and know how to contain it. As of today the structure is already compromised and it’s not containing nuclear waste efficiently

1

Anonymous #1 21h

Hi, did you read my comment? I didn’t say they were going to do anything nefarious with Chernobyl. I said they weren’t gonna keep it up and the environmental consequences would be terrible. Also, you Russia gives a flying fuck about containing Chernobyl? They don’t even care about their own people.

1

Anonymous #2 21h

If you’re referring to my comments about a Chernobyl, I know you didn’t, but it’s also something important to think about.

1

Anonymous #1 21h

By that logic, what’s so bad about British occupying most of Africa because now they share a lot of culture and they have a shared history? Ukraine had it independence. Russia has no need of it. They are just making a power play because Ukraine would be a really good space for Russian defense. They do not care about the people. They certainly don’t give a shit about the culture. They want that area for defense.

1