
left wing/progressive messaging inherently requires unpacking the problems/failures of the status quo, whereas right wing/conservative commentary amounts to “it used to be better” and “it’s brown people’s fault”. When you have a short attention span, aren’t well educated, or lack critical thinking skills, conservative messaging is much more comprehensible/palatable.
The majority of voters fell for numerous extremely well documented lies by the Trump campaign (claiming he was good for the economy, that he was good for peace, and various lies and fearmongering about immigrants). They fell for disinformation about USAID and social services fraud and they falsely believed Trump wanted the Epstein files released. Many Gen Z men further fell for anti-woke fearmongering by internet commentators like Rogan.
I mean it kind of does, when you note that her whole campaign attempted to appeal to the ‘undecided conservative voter’ by moving right on like all the major issues. conservative propaganda has outsized influence, and the harris campaign didn’t do enough to rebut/counterattack that messaging with their base, which resulted in poor performance.
I think mamdani is kind of a poor example here, because of the candidates he ran against. Sliwa was a nut job (love him for it) and cuomo was a known sexual abuser, which significantly bolstered mamdani’s chances. I don’t think mamdani wins if NYC dems put forward a competent candidate instead of cuomo, and i say this as a Mamdani supporter.
Anyone running for a public office can say one thing and do another. The DNC said Biden was mentally fit to be president when it was obvious he wasn’t, and said he would be a transitional president but kept him in the race. I agree with you about his lying but saying either side are liars will just make the argument go in circles.