Anonymous #1 1d

Don’t ask the AI illegal shit and it doesn’t matter

-6

Anonymous #3 1d

Bruh you cannot be serious with that take

21

Anonymous #4 1d

I’ll see you in the Peter Thiel work camps

13

Anonymous #1 1d

Just add a banner that says “18+” no need for id verification It’s ineffective but it would at least clearly allow for content filtering like “hey my account is set for no NSFW so my chatbot will not allow that by default”

14

Anonymous #4 1d

So much shit is always linked to ur ID why does it matter if ai is

-3

Anonymous #3 1d

Protecting children is the priority

5

Anonymous #3 1d

Dawg we want less stuff to be linked to our ID We dont want our ID in a database more then it already is .

22

Anonymous #3 1d

Tracking children’s identification and browsing data is not protecting children

13

Anonymous #1 1d

Any AI programmed to say sexually explicit things should require ID that doesn’t mean all AI has to lmao. Like ChatGPT will not speak sexually, and you can program it not to so it is completely possible.

1

Anonymous #1 1d

That’s absolutely not true. Device-attested age verification can do this without exposing you to privacy risks. The real problem is that we haven’t mandated device-attested age verification yet

1

Anonymous #8 1d

That most definitely has its own issues lol Even the age API bill is an issue, good luck figuring out how to do that on LFS or say, the operating system your car uses. Do you now have to put in your age to use a smart fridge? A TV? I get that’s targeted at windows and macOS but the device age verification is kinda fundamentally at odds with Linux

1

Anonymous #5 1d

It doesn’t have to implicate any of that. Age attestation is fundamentally a transaction-oriented process; you don’t have to mandate that every device knows your age, you can mandate that age-sensitive services check your age attestation. If it’s not available, you simply don’t get that service on that device

1

Anonymous #8 1d

On a lot of GNU/Linux distros, the idea is that there’s fundamentally no way to stop someone from mocking/faking that transaction.

1

Anonymous #8 1d

My issue is that they are mandating that every device knows your age RIGHT NOW in California in 2027 It just doesn’t make sense for Linux, sure they can add it to desktop distros but yeah there’s no way to guarantee authenticity, by design

1

Anonymous #5 1d

You’ve gotta accept that Linux almost certainly won’t be able to participate in this process. There are methods for proving authenticity, but they do rely on a combination of hardware and software. To me, that’s a very small trade off

1

Anonymous #1 8h

How about when you confirm your age as a minor(without ID) the chat bot doesn't get sexual with you. Look at the John Oliver episode on AI(like 3 weeks ago) the AI pushes sexual interaction when it's marketed as just a friend. It's not about needing ID, it's about not allowing a sexual experience for someone actively saying they are a minor. Also if the chat bot has sexual interaction it should be labeled as 17+ in the App Store so parents can block those apps without needing an ID

1

Anonymous #7 8h

What

1

Anonymous #9 6h

Growing up I wish I had a safe LLM to talk to about this versus discovering internet porn, which is worse

1

Anonymous #8 5h

Oh yes there are ways to prove authenticity but that’s just not something that will happen on most GNU/Linux distros Nor should it, nor should the laws force you to

1