Anonymous #1 10w

“Oh it’s fine he just raped this specific woman using an inanimate object and not his penis, not true rape”

22

Anonymous #2 10w

That’s not what i said, but thanks for putting words in my mouth. You said “rapist” He was not convicted of rape. I never said it was “fine”, it’s disgusting. be factually accurate.

-9

Anonymous #1 10w

You’re playing semantics just like they are: he 100% raped her but because at the time rape was defined as “with a sexual organ” and not inanimate objects they call it “sexual abuse” instead, while still very much being rape

19

Anonymous #2 10w

i’m not arguing with you on what you think is rape. by the law, and jury, he was not convicted of rape. simply that is all.

-8

Anonymous #1 10w

What’s crazy is that I wasn’t talking abt trump specifically and yet you still automatically went to him 💀

22

Anonymous OP 10w

Who else would you be talking about on this woke website lmfao

-8

Anonymous #1 10w

You have not been to some of the college yak pages

4

Anonymous #1 10w

Matt Gaetz, bill clinton, Bridget Ziegler

10

Anonymous #1 10w

By that Logic, OJ Simpson is innocent

10

Anonymous #1 10w

“Erm he was only liable for sexual assault”

9

Anonymous #1 10w

because the statute of limitations were up the judge clarified that he would definitely be convicted otherwise

3

“Hate logic” “no use arguing” when you are ignoring simple logic and refusing to elaborate outside of your original sentence or 2

3

Anonymous #7 10w

They all have like one or 2 memorized talking points and once they’re debunked they are incapable of adapting or actually continuing a discussion.

1