Anonymous #1 2d

Look up Biden’s “disinformation governance board” and tell me that’s not some 1984 level shit. I’m sorry but you have been brainwashed. The media isn’t telling you the truth.

-5

Anonymous OP 2d

I hate to break it to you but a government panel intended to stop braindead manlets like you telling people to inject bleach to stop COVID is not the same as the entire GOP ignoring the blaring alarms in front of their faces to placate daddy Trump

13

Anonymous #1 2d

Maybe that’s what it was intended to do but do you seriously think governments will use power as intended? Get your head out of the sand. Doesn’t matter the intention, you give someone something to wield and you might find yourself on the receiving end in the future.

-4

Anonymous #3 2d

Why they fuck are my tax dollars going towards teaching CRT? That’s a violation of MY free speech! Thank god Trump is getting those sons of bitches out of my wallet!

-2

Anonymous #3 2d

That’s not banning. That’s called defunding. Find another fund and stfu

2

Sorry but I’m not going to support moronic ideologies. If a teacher is teaching CRT and racial gender ideology I am not okay with my tax dollars funding that teacher’s salary. Those teachers do not have a right to my money.

-4

Anonymous OP 2d

go back to europe whitey

10

Anonymous #5 2d

I’m literally Latino

-2

Anonymous #5 2d

Racism?

-1

Anonymous #6 2d

How enlightening

0

Anonymous OP 2d

So you want presidents to be able to ban or withhold money from things that they personally don’t agree with? You’re okay with that?

5

Anonymous #2 2d

Are you in favor of presidents attempting to make institutions and companies do what they want ideologically?

5

Anonymous #3 2d

Private institutions aren’t inherently related to government. If you decide to fund something, you can stop funding it. What’s stopping them from finding other funds, and why does the government have to fund things that are not part of it? If you want to talk about pushing ideology, that’s what the public school system is for.

1

Anonymous #2 2d

You didn’t answer. Try again

1

Anonymous #3 2d

But I did answer. Whatever you fund, you have the ability to stop funding. Maybe those institutions and companies shouldn’t be relying on the government to fund themselves? The moment you even put funding as a government into something private you are creating leverage for wielding them. I don’t think governments should be putting their hands in like that, and don’t be surprised that pulling out has similar effect.

1

Anonymous #2 2d

I didn’t ask if presidents have the ability to or not. So if you don’t think that, do you support the Trump admin using funding as a method to force ideological change within these companies and institutions?

1

Anonymous #3 2d

That’s the price they paid for reliance on government funds. You should be asking why they’d hand themselves over.

1

Anonymous #2 2d

I didn’t ask if you thought that was the price they paid. Try again. You love avoiding questions.

1

Anonymous #3 2d

Read between the lines. Do you need glasses?

1

Anonymous #2 2d

Answer the question directly. You trying your hardest to avoid giving a direct answer isn’t gonna work. Try again.

1

Anonymous #3 2d

I’m just saying, there are plenty of rich people who have the power and probably the agreement with it to fund the institutions whose government funds are being taken away. The moment you get government funds you accept that they can be taken back. The current administration can do whatever they want with the funds that they have. If the apportionment is not favorable to you, appoint another executive, or don’t fund the government, i.e stop paying taxes.

1

Anonymous #2 2d

Say as much as you want, you didn’t answer. I’m not asking about logistics or the capacity of an admin doing these things yes or no, do you support Trumps admin threatening to withhold funds in an effort to make these institutions cave to their ideological agenda?

1

Anonymous #3 2d

Why would I be in favor of it? Why would I not be?

1

Anonymous OP 2d

Latino isn’t a race. U can be white and Latino

1

Anonymous #2 2d

So why can’t you apply this logic to daddy Donald?

7

Anonymous #2 2d

That’s not an answer. Try again.

1

Anonymous #3 2d

You’re really asking me if I’m in favor of the ideology. Any government can use its funds however it sees fit. I’m fine with CRT, as long as it’s approached as a way to examine it as an idea, rather than to push it as the one to be adopted.

-1

Anonymous #3 2d

Quite frankly, yes. Definitely. I absolutely want president’s to be able to withhold money from things they disagree with. In fact, it’s their DUTY to do that. That’s exactly what the people vote elected representatives into office to do.

-1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 2d

Well, my skin is brown. I sure as hell am not white

1

Anonymous #2 2d

Of course I am more referring to higher education, where we should be impartially examine ideologies to understand our history and psychology, as well as the flaws of those ideologies and the flaws of our own.

1

Anonymous OP 2d

Ok then ur not a white Latino it’s as simple as that😭 Latino isn’t a race tho. It’s an ethnicity.

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 2d

The only race is human race. Question is which car is in first place

0

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 2d

No, I’m not white. My ancestors are literally a mixture of people who descended from Latin America

1

Anonymous #2 2d

I’m actually asking if you’re in favor of the specific practice, you’re not answering. Yes or no?

1

Anonymous OP 2d

Do you think presidents should be able to call for the restriction of speech that they disagree with ?

1

Anonymous #3 2d

Not the speech of private citizens. Free speech should be absolute for everybody of their own volition. The President absolutely can and should restrict taxpayer money from being used to fund certain ideologies. For example, a teacher should not be allowed to teach CRT in the classroom to children. That’s not what we pay them to do. The teacher can say and do anything she wants OUTSIDE of the classroom during her own free time, but not on the taxpayer’s dime.

1

Anonymous OP 2d

So you don’t agree with this, right?

1

Anonymous #3 2d

You expect someone to take a newspaper headline word for word?

1

Anonymous #3 2d

That’s 100% false

1

Anonymous OP 2d

Prove it!

1

Anonymous #2 2d

Yes or no, was the question. Hurry up moron

1

Anonymous #3 2d

I answered your damn question. Actually read what I said. If I didn’t think favorably of it, I wouldn’t be saying the government is perfectly able to do it. I have no problem with the ability to do so.

1

Anonymous #2 2d

So then you only support it when it doesn’t offend you, got it!

1

Anonymous #3 2d

Prove it. Prove that I got offended when it was used. You should also know my exact beliefs such that you would know whatever offends me, which requires you to know me. And you know nothing, so I don’t want to hear it.

1

Anonymous #2 2d

Your contradictory logic proves it! Thanks for making it so easy to prove that lol. I know you’re offended by what Biden did but not by what’s Trumps doing which is why you’re in favor of that practice only when it’s stuff that doesn’t offend you! Try again moron 😁

1

Anonymous #3 2d

None of my logic is contradictory. I haven’t spoken about anything prior. You have no basis lol. You really are a grandstanding imbecile.

1

Anonymous #2 2d

It doesn’t surprise me that, that was your best counter argument. So we’ll try this again for you moron. I know it’s hard. Do you think presidents should use funds as a means to make institutions ideologically align with them, yes or no?

1

Anonymous #3 2d

Hard to counter an argument that isn’t there. If the President owns the funds, they can do what they want with it.

1

Anonymous OP 2d

So native

4

Anonymous #2 2d

Not what I asked, try again.

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 2d

I don’t know man. I’m Latino. My ancestors could’ve been native or European or African and I wouldn’t know unless I took a DNA test. You know it may come as a shock to you but outside of America hardly anyone gives a shit about race.

-2

Anonymous OP 2d

Yes no I very much know that💀 but if ur in here talking American politics u gotta realize ppl are gonna assume ur from America tf? Lmao 💀

7

Anonymous OP 2d

“US politics”

2

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 2d

Did I say I wasn’t American?

1