Umm no. Distracts must meet several criteria. Yes, one is that they must be reasonably shaped. But another is that they must be as equal as possible to the states popular vote. A more fair Nevada map would have two Vegas based districts and then one with some Vegas suburbs stretching up the California border to Carson City
Your second point just isn’t true. That’s not how districts are drawn, if we did that it’d literally be gerrymandering, because you’d be intentionally diluting organic communities (i.e. cities) to match the voting habits of sparsely populated rural areas. districts have to be roughly equal in population.
Yes. You are correct. I misspoke and I’m sorry for that. That being said, the makeup of the congressional delegation should be representative of the state as a whole. Because that’s what politicians are supposed to do. And representing 25% of districts in a state where you got about 50% of the popular vote is not representative. Just admit that Nevada’s map is gerrymandered 😂
It isn’t. And frankly I would support them gerrymandering it to be more blue since Texas has declared intentions to literally rig the midterms with early redistricting. If you want more representative districts, perhaps we should expand the house which we randomly stopped doing in the 1920s.