Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Since y’all wanna talk about gerrymandering so bad, this is the 2024 results in Nevada. So go 🖕 yourselves
-4 upvote, 58 comments. Yik Yak image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "Since y’all wanna talk about gerrymandering so bad, this is the 2024 results in Nevada. So go 🖕 yourselves"
upvote -4 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

Also, these aren’t NEARLY as bad as Texas and you know this.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

Picking Nevada as if this isn’t one of the least gerrymandered states

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

And New Jersey

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

These are done in the census every decade (2010, 2020, 2030). Texas doing this for the midterms is a clear ploy to undermine our democratic systems as they stand.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

Refer to my post on Texas and the like 5 other examples under it ^^

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

And here’s Illinois

post
upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 7w

Oh so gerrymandering is okay as long as it’s done at the start of the decade?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 7w

You genuinely believe that Republicans getting a minority of seats in a state they won the popular vote in is BETTER than Texas? Least biased liberal over here…

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

yes?? because congressional seats are decided by district, as a state overall. illinois’s is pretty gerrymandered, but the districts in Nevada are perfectly logical.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 7w

*not as a state overall

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 7w

the districts in nevada are quite normally shaped.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 7w

Umm no. Distracts must meet several criteria. Yes, one is that they must be reasonably shaped. But another is that they must be as equal as possible to the states popular vote. A more fair Nevada map would have two Vegas based districts and then one with some Vegas suburbs stretching up the California border to Carson City

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

Your second point just isn’t true. That’s not how districts are drawn, if we did that it’d literally be gerrymandering, because you’d be intentionally diluting organic communities (i.e. cities) to match the voting habits of sparsely populated rural areas. districts have to be roughly equal in population.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 7w

Yes. You are correct. I misspoke and I’m sorry for that. That being said, the makeup of the congressional delegation should be representative of the state as a whole. Because that’s what politicians are supposed to do. And representing 25% of districts in a state where you got about 50% of the popular vote is not representative. Just admit that Nevada’s map is gerrymandered 😂

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

It isn’t. And frankly I would support them gerrymandering it to be more blue since Texas has declared intentions to literally rig the midterms with early redistricting. If you want more representative districts, perhaps we should expand the house which we randomly stopped doing in the 1920s.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 7w
post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 7w

You just don’t know what you’re talking about. Plain and simple

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 7w

Nevada has received an F from non partisan sources for their fairness. But fine. Illinois is also mentioned. You know… the most gerrymandered state

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

lmao Texas is the most gerrymandered state

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 7w

Not currently

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

With the new map it is

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

You want me to show you Florida, both Carolinas, Texas, Wisconsin,

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

Before that it competed with Illinois

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

Competed*

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

Wisconsin is not gerrymandered. It has two competitive districts. And sure, you can show me those other states. Then I’ll show you Maryland, New Mexico, and Oregon. Hell even Alabama has a map that’s considered Democrat favorable

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

Is this red eagle politics?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w
post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

Lmao no. Fuck that guy he’s basically a white nationalist

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

You clearly don’t know how gerrymandering works if you can’t see Wisconsin is gerrymandered to hell

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

But seriously any map that doesn’t have Maryland in the red is not reliable. Even the most left biased people admit Maryland is gerrymandered

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

Magically the 2 Dem districts are D+26, and D+21 being packed when the republicans are spread out and cracked across the districts to get a good safe seat but also competitive seat spread.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

Wisconsin just has terrible geography for democrats. Almost every dem in the state is in Madison and Milwaukee

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

Most states Dems live in one area…

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

Yes Democrats do tend to be more compact but in Wisconsin it’s particularly extreme

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

And that’s literally what I’m saying about Nevada too lmao. Most republicans packed into one deep red district and then the other three are magically just enough to be lean democrat. But you’re saying Nevada isn’t gerrymandered. Makeup your mind lol

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

I never said Nevada isn’t even the chart I pulled up agrees it’s gerrymandered.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

What I’m more trying to say is that on average republicans currently gerrymander way more and a lot worse.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

My b. I got you mixed up with someone else. But my point still stands that drawing four dem districts in Wisconsin would be incredibly difficult

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

Well I just disagree. We do it for sure. But dems do it a lot too. And dems are far more likely to criticize gerrymandering

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

I’ve done worse..

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w
post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

Here’s a map I made personally as a meme

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

I could easily make a VRA complaint 4 Dem lean mal

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

That’s an abomination

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

Map*

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

Correct 🤣

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

But unfortunately that’s probably what the map will look like in 10 years 😢

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

I doubt it the Dems have been pretty alr on gerrymandering with most of the Dem states having independent commissions.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

There’s also a reason I’m skeptical they will even redraw after the Texas thing. If they do even this is anti democratic when your opponents are doing it and you don’t you are just giving up.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

In my opinion the most fair states are Arizona, Colorado, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

Currently Wisconsin has a gerrymandering court battle ongoing

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

Washington too. I know Cali’s technically got an independent commission but I don’t actually think it’s super independent

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

Pennsylvania is rlly good imo it’s split 50/50 which for a state that basically votes 50/50 is good

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

Pennsylvania’s old map was one of the most cursed things I’ve ever seen. I’m so glad that’s gone even if I did give the GOP the advantage

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

I personally advocate tho for instead of landed voting do it by % where if let’s say state voted 60% Dem but 40% Republican in a state with like 10 reps you’d send 6 Dems and 4 republicans who rank the highest kind of like Germanys parliament

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

I’d be in favor of that too

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

Where you rank candidates and also party

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

It makes so your voice can’t be taken away as much and your vote no matter what counts

upvote 1 downvote