Anonymous #1 17w

I don’t mean this in the “show proof nerd” way, but what in particular do you think that is? Like what policies and stuff. Bc personally I think project 2025 (is very long) and has some boiler plate conservative stuff in it. The problem for me is the super radical parts that include banning contreception and going overboard on deportation.

-1

Anonymous #1 17w

Now I will be upfront and say I’m a LOT less willing to believe in the slippery slope toward those worse things as I’m sure you do, but ig seeing where u see the overlap can help me understand rhat

0

Anonymous OP 17w

https://www.project2025.observer

3

Anonymous OP 17w

This source has a breakdown of every objective per department

3

Anonymous #1 17w

I think that has been the case since Obama at least. He literally said as much in a quote, rho i honestly can’t remembe the exact phrasing. The legislature has basically become a check in the box instead of the leading body, waiting for the president to make moves. Biden did similar with his mandates. I don’t think it’s right in any situation, but it’s not like he’s out of the norm

-1

Anonymous #1 17w

And the courts are still (sadly) biased. Liberal judges are MUCH more likely to be activists and target things that the trump Administration does. That doesn’t mean there aren’t situations where he’s wrong and they’re right to challenge, but sometimes they go eayyyyy to dar

-1

Anonymous OP 17w

No I’m talking in particular about wanting to reign in control of historically independent organizations. The president is not allowed to fire the board members of independent agencies without merit (I.e, can’t fire for political reasons) - this includes: the FED (economists are better money handlers than the president), the FEC (federal election commission - I’m sure you see how dangerous that is to be in control of one person), amongst many, many others.

3

Anonymous OP 17w

Like what? What biased judges have targeted Trump unlawfully?

1

Anonymous OP 17w

I understand the need to reign in judicial authority, but I hope you realize like 95% of these cases are because Trump is doing clearly illegal stuff. He knows he is, and he knows that doing a ton at the same time is going to overwhelm the system. By the time it’s cooled down, he’ll have centralized way more power than any president in modern times.

2

Anonymous #2 17w

I mean having over 30+ charges magically disappear bc they were all pursued for political reasons can certainly be one example

-1

Anonymous OP 17w

What are you referring to?

3

Anonymous OP 17w

Homie the Supreme Court which has three Trump appointed judges voted 9-0 telling Trump to bring back Garcia because he was denied due process.

3

Anonymous OP 17w

They didn’t disappear. Had he been treated like a normal criminal it would interfere with his ability to be president The judge was also not the one who filed charges against him. Try that again bud.

1

Anonymous #2 17w

If he was a normal person, he wouldn’t have been targeted in the first place. And no shit Sherlock, the DA did, also known as a key part of JUDICIAL proceedings. They continuously let those cases proceed with constant rule changes that made it difficult for him to defend himself.

0

Anonymous OP 17w

You said biased JUDGES targeted Trump They have no legal basis to deny someone who has legal right to accuse someone of a crime.

1

Anonymous #2 17w

Biased DA’s brought about faulty charges. Activist judges then proceeded to prosecute those charges, and drag out the proceedings to run him through the mud. You can disagree but it was so obvious it was embarrassing

-1

Anonymous OP 17w

Oh spare me the bullshit foxnews. These weren't activist judges that's called trump being held accountable

3

Anonymous OP 17w

Faulty charges HOW. You calling them faulty doesn’t inherently make them faulty. Can you actually name what he was charged with?

0

Anonymous #2 17w

“Faulty” charges brought up in little to no evidence, with clear political intent, that would have NEVER seen a court room in ANY other situation. Pulling out technicalities and making any excuse to throw another charge in. You’re telling me a MULTI BILLIONARE who has been a public darling his ENTIRE LIFE magically became a crooked criminal lying about the value of his properties? Like be fr

-1

Anonymous OP 17w

He’s been seeing the inside of court rooms for decades. What were his charges, without looking them up name 6.

1

Anonymous #2 17w

Nearly all of them were related to him “falsifying” business records. More specifically, overvaluing his assets, which anybody sane rightfully pointed out was insane and they just made up a number that nobody in their right mind would have assessed it.

0

Anonymous OP 17w

So you believe that these CLEARLY faulty charges went through a literal jury, and not a single person on that jury could catch that?

1

Anonymous OP 17w

You think this is the first time Trump ever got into legal trouble

3