Anonymous #1 2d

if our president starts a war that will impact gas prices then yes. if a war starts that our president did NOT start (ukraine and russia) then no. if a global pandemic effects supply chain issues and our president did not start the global pandemic then no

68

Anonymous #2 2d

i've found that there's more real human republicans who do this than democrats, but definitely bots contribute a lot

33

Anonymous OP 2d

I think of gas and grocery prices like a sail boat and the president is the captain, yeah he may not control the way the wind blows but he certainly steers the fucking ship. Unfortunately.😞

-3

Anonymous #1 2d

"on day one"

10

Anonymous #3 2d

aint no way 💀💀

30

Anonymous #3 2d

This mf so damn stupid

33

Anonymous #5 2d

Like, how do they not see that they’re applying different standards to each situation?

1

Anonymous #3 2d

no, it's not. when you bomb a country that controls a major shipping lane for oil, gas prices go up.

22

Anonymous #7 2d

Ok lmao

-6

Anonymous #3 2d

When you have studied real economics let me know 🤣

-5

Anonymous #3 1d

“I send meme so clearly I’m smarter than you”

17

Anonymous #2 1d

No Trump is purposefully doing inflationary actions while Biden responded to inflationary events, huge difference.

5

Anonymous #3 1d

The gas prices shot up by an entire fucking dollar within a week of starting this shit with Iran and you’re gonna sit here and tell me the shit with Iran isn’t the leading cause of the fucking price jump? I think YOU might be at the peak of Mount Stupid.

12

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 1d

That’s true but you forget to mention the war with Iran was inevitable. If we didn’t stop them and they nuked us gas would shoot up to $100 in one day and most of us would be dead

-2

Anonymous #12 1d

Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons

9

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 1d

I have beachfront property in Nevada to sell u if you believe that

-2

Anonymous #12 1d

iran was not going to start a war with america. they’ve been preparing for 40 years for an attack from us first, they’re not dumb

6

Anonymous #12 1d

their nuke would have to be very long range as well which is a whole different thing than just developing one. we’d also have ample time to intercept a nuke if for some reason they developed one capable of traveling 6,500 miles. the real country at risk of iran having nukes is israel because it’s much closer

5

Anonymous #12 1d

And I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you if you’re actually buying that “weeks away from a nuke” line that the Iran War-Hawks in America and Israel have been spouting for 30 years. “Weeks away” they’ve been saying, for the last 1,560 weeks.

5

Anonymous #6 1d

Ok. I have a lot of family still in Israel. I wouldn’t want that either

0

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 1d

That rumor doesn’t just come out of thin air. Iran displayed itself as weak and helpless and look at how bad they overloaded our military

0

Anonymous #12 1d

sounds like an israel problem and not an american one. israel has its own army, americans shouldn’t be fighting for them

3