Anonymous #1 14w

And Israel bombed apartments(not apartment buildings) because that’s where the military leaders were

0

Anonymous #1 14w

Ohhh, just apartments, not full buildings? Well that makes the civilian casualties so much more reasonable. Let me guess? next it’s ‘surgical airstrikes’ with 500 lb bombs? If ‘he was in there somewhere’ is your moral compass, you might wanna recalibrate

1

Anonymous #2 14w

Yes it does make it better. You can’t have war without civilian casualties

0

Anonymous #1 14w

No, civilian casualties aren’t just some unfortunate rule of war...they’re a moral failure. Bombing dense civilian areas on bullshit intel isn’t ‘war,’ it’s shouting "I'm a pussy" disguised as strategy. If you can justify dead children, you’ve already lost the argument and your humanity. 🤙🏽

1

Anonymous #2 14w

Wdym the intel was great they killed the bad guys

0

Anonymous #2 14w

The only way you could theoretically have less civilian casualties is a ground invasion of Iran. Is that what you want?

1

Anonymous #1 14w

You're not about to sit here and tell me that the civilian deaths are proportional to actual threats because that's fucking crazy.

1

Anonymous #2 14w

Ok let me ask you this do you support the U.S. war against Germany in the 1940s?

1

Anonymous #1 14w

Lol I think I know where this is going...but sure.

1

Anonymous #2 14w

And you realize that American bombing campaigns caused enormous civilian casualties? Does that make fighting against the nazis an unjust war?

1

Anonymous #1 14w

#1, let me just cut in and say your comparison is completely stupid. You cannot compare civilian casualties between pre-guided-bombs era and post-guided-bombs era.

2

Anonymous #1 14w

Knew it. Comparing Iran to Nazi Germany is lazy and wrong. Iran isn’t invading nations or committing industrial genocide. Israel isn’t the U.S. liberating Europe...it’s an occupying force targeting a rival. This isn’t WWII.

1

Anonymous #1 14w

Comparing Iran’s civilian casualties to Nazi Germany’s ignores scale, context, and intent. The Allies bombed cities to defeat a genocidal empire. Israel’s strikes kill civilians under the guise of “precision,” targeting enemies buried in neighborhoods...not the same war, not the same stakes.

1

Anonymous #2 14w

Iran would literally commit genocide against millions of people if they got a nuclear weapon

1

Anonymous #2 14w

Cue you justifying genocide against Jews because they have land that some Arab guy wants or something like that

1

Anonymous #1 14w

If Iran really wanted genocide, they wouldn’t need nukes...they’ve had decades of proxy wars to try. But guess what? They haven’t. Nukes aren’t genocide weapons...they’re suicide notes if used first. You’re confusing propaganda with policy.

1

Anonymous #2 14w

Ok what do you think they want nukes for then?

1

Anonymous #2 14w

And they have committed genocide with their proxies where were you on October 7?

1

Anonymous #1 14w

The same reason any other dipshit wants nukes. To assert power. Jesus fucking Christ.

1

Anonymous #1 14w

Ahhhh, ‘genocide by proxy’...because if someone you’ve funded once does something awful, you’re automatically Hitler. That’s not how words or accountability work. If you’re gonna cry genocide, at least learn what it actually means first.

1