Anonymous #1 9w

Trigger word

0

Anonymous #3 9w

For republicans

6

Anonymous OP 9w

For anyone on this app lol

2

Anonymous #3 9w

Someone’s angwy lol

-3

Anonymous moderatemonkey 9w

This is how you provide a source OP

-5

Anonymous #1 9w

That’s literally not a source. Thats a person saying something.

14

Anonymous #4 9w

Which thing on the list would you like a source for?

5

Anonymous OP 9w

“That you can read through following Jan 6th investigations.”

-4

Anonymous #4 9w

Nobody should be getting mad until sources are requested but denied or it’s a shitty source, which is predominantly the case when it comes to republicans, so it shouldn’t be that much of a surprise lol

13

Anonymous #1 9w

Sources are readily available with a couple key words and a google search. Instead of demanding sources for a literal list of over 20 events maybe ask for more specifics or something besides being “subtly” pretentious

5

Anonymous #1 9w

Not saying monkeymoderate is wrong. If I say "fourth of July is actually about women's rights" then end it with "you can read through history books" that's not providing a source.. Yk that right?

4

Anonymous #5 9w

It wasn’t subtle

-1

Anonymous #5 9w

That means nothing. There are thousands and millions of results in a google search, surely it wouldn’t be inconvenient to cite things.

0

Anonymous #7 9w

And yet I could find a source in just minutes if you only asked me for a specific one… go ahead I promise the internet won’t bite. In all honesty though the way you worded this makes it sound like you’ve never had to do a research paper or had to fact check/cite sources for a paper before, because it really only takes a couple minutes to find a truthful (can still be slightly biased) article and snap a screen shot of it, I don’t even have to fuck around making a legit works cited

1

Anonymous #5 9w

Where’s the screenshot at then princess?

-3

Anonymous #1 9w

Are you illiterate?

0

Anonymous #6 9w

Idts

-3

Anonymous #1 9w

Maybe you should double check that then… I mean I don’t even have to look up sources for “didn’t stop the Ukraine war in 24 hours” and “stole national security secrets” or “is a convicted felon” or “us rich off generational wealth and not generated wealth” or “didn’t get Mexico to pay for a continuous wall” or “praises dictators and gangsters” all that is well known information that the rights has twisted to make the left the big bad boogeyman/secret Illuminati pulling the strings lmao

0

Anonymous #5 9w

And plus this is t even my post or my original claims, instead of demanding I defend (what’s agreeable to me) claims, add counter evidence and then we can actually start a debate instead of just “sOuRcEs??? Hahaga gOtEmmm”

0

Anonymous #5 9w

ur so mad. Ts is so funny

-3

Anonymous #1 9w

Dude you’re the one getting all bent out of shape about there not being sources lol, I’m just getting frustrated at dealing with this type of stupidity all the time with republicans, you can’t fault me for their own (and your) moral and intellectual inadequacies. This isn’t my job nor the best use of my time, but ya “you’re so mad” sure did win you the comment threat crown 🤡

1

Anonymous #5 9w

All I said was ask for some specifics but you obviously aren’t interested in actual information, you just wanted to have a “gotcha moment” and got mad when I gave a perfectly logical and helpful hand. Do you actually want some sources or do you just want to argue and be an angwy wittle wed hat fascwist?

1

Anonymous #5 9w

How can counter evidence be provided if you have yet to provide the evidence to be countered?

2

Anonymous #5 9w

Yes. I am clearly bent out of shape

-1

Anonymous #7 9w

THANK YOU. ThErEs SoUrCeS eVeRyWhErE

0

Anonymous #5 9w

Until you provide data or some kind of supporting source (which by making an assertion becomes a burden to you) you have only said “x is true, you can find evidence everywhere” which is nothing but a personal stamp of approval to give symbolic yet worthless merit to your assertions. Nobody should have to do your research.

3

Anonymous #7 9w

Ya so you obviously don’t give a shit about hearing any actual evidence since you refuse to read me saying “give me a couple specific points and I’ll give you the evidence to support them” literally 4 times so far. 4 times my guy. Get a life troll

1

Anonymous #7 9w

I’ve literally asked you for a couple specific points so that I can do just that, but you keep refusing to and instead keep arguing…

1

Anonymous #7 9w

And I never made the initial assertion, I’ve just ATTEMPTED to defend it constructively but you both keep refusing to ask for specific points to source instead of demanding all 21 of the bullet points explained for you

2

Anonymous #5 9w

Bro you don’t give a shit. Again don’t make me do your research. If you have something to corroborate your assertion lay it in here, genuinely. Otherwise you can’t get pissy about me refusing to do your work for you. You could literally be right about everything you say, because truth exists whether or not you refuse to provide evidence for it. But I have no reason to believe you if there is no support here.

2

Anonymous #5 9w

There is nothing constructive about saying that “the evidence is there, just do a couple Google searches”.

3

Anonymous #5 9w

And I’m not arguing for or against the bullet points. I’m just pointing out that telling people to do a couple unspecified google searches is an insufficient substitute for citation

3

Anonymous #5 9w

And tbh it would be nice if any one of you, provided literally anything to start something. Generously, it’s anyone’s ball at this point. 1 can keep talking and not have anything to defend themselves from future points but it won’t be known until something’s thrown in. Likewise 1 can annoyingly and yet reasonably refuse until there is evidence to counter.

1

Anonymous #1 9w

I’ll try to start y’all. Did Trump lose the 2020 election?

1

Anonymous #7 9w

I believe that most of the claims in the original post are false. And some of them are simply just opinions. If there are sources to support the claims, I would love to read/watch/listen to them, see if it’s a legitimate source or not. But I’m just being told to google random claims.

0

Anonymous #7 9w

Yeah, there is no strong evidence to prove otherwise. That is why there have been no fraud suits brought forward by the Trump campaign.

0

Anonymous #5 9w

Do you agree?

1

Anonymous #7 9w

So are you insisting that I give evidence for all of the claims made by OP or selective ones? That’s all I need to help you for the fifth time now, give me what you want more specifically than “sOurCe???” I’m more than happy to help you if you just told me what you want 🤣I’ve given you multiple starts to help lead you into asking but you keep insisting on arguing that I’m responsible for listing all the sources to over 20 individual points

1

Anonymous #5 9w

I’m starting yall out. Find something you both disagree on and go from there.

1

Anonymous #5 9w

Who is demanding anything from you? You butted in here and started acting all high and mighty. I was just fucking around and you took it soooo personally

0

Anonymous #1 9w

Dude I literally asked you what you wanted sources on, that’s what started ALL of this 🤡🤡🤡🤡

1

Anonymous #5 9w

Did I reply seriously? No. Not until 7 joined in and started having a civil discussion. Obv you can’t pick up on cues

1

Anonymous #1 9w

So it’s my fault you weren’t serious until you had a fan boy encourage you on?

0

Anonymous #5 9w

How did he encourage me? He called me out too. I just answered.

1

Anonymous #1 9w

Eh you weren’t as big of a focus because I read through and thought 5 was taking the place of being in the right by default, which I don’t believe is a good way to start a constructive discussion. Can y’all find something in the 20 points that you disagree on?

1

Anonymous #7 9w

Honestly I don’t feel like it would be productive for any of the three of us to continue this conversation. Neither 5 nor I are gonna agree or budge on our viewpoints, and it’s just a pissing contest atp

1

Anonymous #1 9w

It wouldn’t hurt to try. This whole thing started off pretty sour, but if we want to make a connection we have to go in charitably that both parties have some will to consider data that might conflict with preexisting views. I can understand 5 if he comes from a place where he has provided sources oftentimes but people didn’t care or completely brush them off to the point where it’s like “well what’s the point of citation atp”, and to that it’s understandable

1

Anonymous #1 9w

You’re demanding I give sources for an ambiguous amount of points out of over 20! Dude you’re clowning rn, don’t start acting the victim after you’ve refused to communicate outside of arguing about this single issue while I’ve given you ample opportunities to let me help you get what you want

1

Anonymous #7 9w

But runs the risk of pushing off people that might actually want to talk about it, even if defensive at first

1

Anonymous #5 9w

I didn’t demand anything from you. Calm down and drink some water

1

Anonymous #5 9w

That’s why yall should find a point that you both conflict over

1

Anonymous #1 9w

Although I would say it’s better to debate on the subject matter of the point rather than the point itself since that would be more direct

1

Anonymous #1 9w

What a troll, maybe I should have just spent the time getting the sources for you instead of assuming you would be a respectful and well intending adult, I genuinely can’t understand why you think I’m being intentionally unhelpful by just asking for a simple start to a conversation

1