Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Why is saying that we should prioritize America and Americans over other nations a bad thing?
upvote 2 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2d

Because libs

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2d

it’s not a bad thing it just can be done recklessly

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2d

What would be an example of reckless use of America 1st?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2d

completely disregarding all of our alliances which is a bad idea

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2d

Acting as though infectious disease programs abroad don’t help us at home

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2d

Explain how they help.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2d

have you ever heard of a pandemic

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2d

We can identify new diseases as they evolve and ensure their impact is minimal when they reach the US. Just look at Ebola as an example. We do the same for malaria and have been doing this for HIV. It’s pretty cheap and saves many lives abroad and at home

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2d

So still, why can’t we do that here?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2d

Why can’t we monitor for diseases that aren’t in the US yet?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2d

not all diseases start in the us

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2d

Correction: AIDS programs aren’t very cheap. There’s a huge impact though and it does help the US too

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2d

So you’re telling me with the technology we have today we can’t study a disease before it affects someone here?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2d

How are we supposed to do that? Set up cameras in every doctor’s office there? Read through all of the medical records?

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2d

Get samples of the diseases maybe? Hence why we already have samples of diseases that have never been reported here.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2d

Some of these countries don’t have the equipment to sequence these samples quickly, and we still need to see the clinical presentation. The sample doesn’t tell us that

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2d

as a biology grad student, i beg of you to stop making suggestions on where/how the study of global diseases should be conducted… you aren’t aware of the logistics nor of how pathology is researched, so please refrain from speaking on that…

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2d

Then speak on it.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2d

I would need like an hour of conversation with you to explain why nothing you suggested is even close to being logically possible within pathology. In fact, what you said about bringing samples here would be the opposite of all laboratory safety precautions regarding biohazards of any kind. you can’t just ship a highly volatile or highly sensitive biohazardous sample by airmail & just say “hope it makes it there without spreading said disease or causing a massive biohazard shutdown!”

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2d

Let me DM you and you can send me all the info.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2d

This is all googleable 😭 did you think it was possible to do this a cheaper way and no one ever considered it?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2d

plus, not every country has access to the correct PPE (personal protective equipment) to study a rapidly spreading illness properly. if we have our pathologists on standby, they can help with the research while simultaneously sending info to our CDC so we can be proactive about potential cases & how to prevent, diagnose, and treat it before it spreads out of control. without that knowledge nor those relationships with other pathologists around the globe, we get blindsided.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2d

i don’t have a textbook on this stuff. this is a B.S. in Biology’s worth of knowledge accumulating into a common sense understanding. just because you don’t have that background doesn’t mean you’re stupid for just not knowing what i know… but you walk yourself into being an ultracrepidarian when you start making suggestions or expressing opinions on topics or subjects that are *entirely outside the scope of your knowledge or expertise.*

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2d

don’t tell them to do that, it’ll just ruin the learning by providing confirmation bias when they start trying to ask it how we COULD do it the way they described.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2d

Shit that’s true lmao

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2d

I didn’t bring up diseases another comment did. You’re right I don’t have a background in it, but neither do a lot of policy makers spending the money on the issue. I asked a question and made a suggestion, I did not say this is the way it needed to be done. I apologize if my ignorance to the matter offended you, but that was the extent of my comments.

upvote 1 downvote