Anonymous #1 5w

Worry about your own house first

7

Anonymous #1 5w

Yeah well there’s barely anything left of Gaza thanks to Trump 💀

3

Anonymous #3 5w

Wouldn’t have been any different under Kamala

-2

Anonymous #1 5w

Seriously? We wouldn’t have helped Israel bomb Hamas negotiators, we wouldn’t have sent military contractors to shoot civilians trying to get food, and we wouldn’t have sent the large bombs we’re sending now

7

Anonymous #3 5w

Do you have any proof for that at all or does it just sound good to say? One of the big reasons she lost is because she literally refused to condemn Israel

-1

Anonymous #1 5w

She would’ve continued to send them billions and billions of dollars all the same

-1

Anonymous #1 5w

That was not a big reason. The biggest reason was the economy, by far. Anyway, the first two just follow from what happened under the previous admin. We never helped them bomb negotiators, and we never sent American military contractors and required all “aid distribution” to go through them so they could shoot kids. Biden constantly pressured Netanyahu to open the border crossings so aid could come in. Barely any aid is happening now. Aid was literally frozen for over a month under this admin

3

Anonymous #1 5w

Yeah and Gaza is still on its way to becoming a parking lot, nothing changes but you at least could’ve voted to protect your fellow Americans from authoritarianism

5

Anonymous #1 5w

You can keep saying that if it makes you feel good, but that’s false. Trump sent the bombs Biden specifically did not send because of civilian casualties.

1

Anonymous #3 5w

oh, during a ceasefire too lmfao

1

Anonymous #2 5w

Or the Democratic Party could’ve picked a different candidate? Kamala was a terrible candidate that did not have a real shot at winning

0

Anonymous #1 5w

In May of this year, we had already sent almost half the military aid we sent for all of last year. We have almost certainly passed last year’s number by now, with 3 months left in the year

1

Anonymous #3 5w

Those “baseless and politicized conditions” were requirements to at least somewhat uphold human rights and allow aid in. Those are gone now and they have a blank check

1

Anonymous #3 5w

Okay? What relevance does that have when talking about the biden administration or Kamala. Nobody here is saying that trump isn’t sending Israel money or weapons.

1

Anonymous #1 5w

I’m not sure how else to explain to you that Trump has sent far more weapons, required no aid, physically involved American PMCs in the genocide, and helped sabotage negotiations. I’ve shown that none of this happened under Biden and wouldn’t happen under Harris

1

Anonymous #3 5w

“Sent far more” and “none of this happened under biden” can’t exist in the same sentence You’re saying Trump sent more weapons and more money to Israel than Biden did, which is true. So then under your own logic with Kamala following the Biden administration, she would’ve continued to send Israel money and weapons

-1

Anonymous #1 5w

They never sent the amount Trump is sending. They even restricted the bombs he’s now sending. I never made the argument that Harris would not have sent weapons at all

1

Anonymous #1 5w

They could’ve but they didn’t and it was way past the primaries when anyone could’ve done anything about it, she wasn’t a great candidate but trump has caused so much more harm that she would’ve. You and other leftists digging in your heels and being single-issue voters helped absolutely nobody

2

Anonymous #2 5w

They knew about Biden’s deteriorating mental clarity long before the primaries were over, I still voted for her but im not going to pretend like she was a great candidate or would have made a great president. The democratic party needs to learn and do better

1