I’m not actually pro-choice because the baby doesn’t have rights to the mothers body— I’m pro-choice because historically pro-life is a way to tie women down to their male counterpart and exploit helpless children for profits
The ability to choose if and when you want to have kids is quite literally freedom for women. That’s why they want to take abortion and birth control away
3
Anonymous#112h
Is the ability to choose if and when to have sex not the same thing? Or do people have a right to have sex without repercussions
-1
Anonymous#211h
Yes they should have the right to sex without repercussions. That’s like saying every time you have sex you should get herpes
4
AnonymousOP11h
No bc sex has a repercussion: kids. Herpes isn’t a possibility for every sex
0
Anonymous#210h
neither is kids…
6
Anonymous#28h
Yes actually people should have the right to have sex without “repercussions.” You’re acting like sex is a shameful thing that should be punished and not a completely normal thing for two consenting adults
1
Anonymous#28h
Plus, no kid deserves to have parents who see them as their “repercussion” the way you seem to imply you would
1
Anonymous#17h
I don’t think it’s shameful, but that’s like saying I should have the right to gamble without losing money. Some actions have consequences. And, unfortunately, some parents do view their kids as mistakes
1
Anonymous#26h
those are not the same… I fear
1
AnonymousOP6h
How so?
1
Anonymous#25h
you literally HAVE to spend money on gambling but you don’t have to have kids to have sex