Anonymous #1 15w

Knowing our gov I’d say real

4

Anonymous #2 15w

Jesus Christ it’s real https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/06/court-rules-for-roundup-maker-in-dispute-over-cancer-warnings-on-pesticide-labels/

14

Anonymous #3 15w

i think if your legal defense for giving people cancer rests on a “technically” you should be cross-cut shredded

6

Anonymous OP 15w

Hey man I’m going by EPA guidelines here if you want to doubt the experts and science be my guest

0

Anonymous #3 15w

and what if you weren’t? what are your personal opinions here? what could possibly lead you to defend cancer on a technicality? please explain. with proof and sources, if possible

1

Anonymous OP 15w

“What if you weren’t” if you’re basing your side of the fact-based conversation on a hypothetical then your argument is trash. It’s like asking “what if the sky was green” or “what if trump saved a baby from a burning building”.

1

Anonymous OP 15w

Please quote exactly where I say anything that clearly states “I think the Supreme Court was right” or “I think cancer is a good thing”. If you read closely you can see I only state the fact that the EPA said the chemical didn’t need a carcinogenic warning and that Bayer was legally in the clear because of it, and that I trust EOA guidelines. Nowhere do I defend cancer.

1