Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
“THATS WHAT I VOTED FOR!!”
640 upvotes, 35 comments. Yik Yak image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "“THATS WHAT I VOTED FOR!!”"
upvote 640 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 5d
post
upvote 156 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous 4d

Ah yes. The pro-life party right? Doing everything in their power to keep these children *checks notes* dying. Hm. That feels backwards

upvote 59 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5d

It’s unfair because they are picking and choosing what they cut funding for instead of just cutting federal funding for everything

upvote 29 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5d

And how many children have died because of this? 0. absolutely none. The battery system isn’t necessary and you guys just fall for everything

upvote -23 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5d

it was not economically viable. read before you get riled up and fall for their tricks and propaganda to hate on trump

post
upvote -23 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5d

here’s the actual article. has nothing to do with children’s hospitals but of course they wanna try to connect bs to make trump look bad. wake up

post
upvote -24 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5d

are you actually stupid? if the hospital loses power, the battery backups keep ventilators running, lights on, elevators running, and keeping medicine in fridges cold

upvote 103 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5d

it still needs to be maintained, tested, and replaced. and hospitals without backup batteries or generators DON’T run without them. that’s the problem. if the power cuts out anyone connected to a machine that is helping keep them alive, will die. you can only hand ventilate so many people. no power means no emergency surgeries or care.

upvote 96 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5d

so it does say the batteries that children’s hospitals use… i fear that maybe you’re just not comprehending???

upvote 111 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5d

yes one of the battery projects was FOR A PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL

post
upvote 92 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5d
post
upvote 81 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5d

i forgot that keeping sick children alive was economic burden my bad. whoops forgot to turn off my empathy and care for literal children

upvote 107 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5d

Im sorry, are you arguing about hospitals having backup generators/batteries? Do you understand the services a hospital provides and then do you understand what a backup generator/battery is for?

upvote 45 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5d

Something that has the potential to harm children should not be passed. Jesus would not want this.

upvote 48 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 5d

Do you know how much money hospitals make? Whether from general operations or contributions they make a shit ton. If those hospitals excuse for not getting backup batteries is bc of trump cutting funding then it’s on them. They never wanted or needed it in the first place

upvote -13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 5d

The hospitals aren’t insolvent by any means. If this is a serious concern or necessity they would get it. yall just want to make trump look bad

upvote -14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5d

yes. a pediatric hospital being promised a backup battery to prevent children from dying from increasingly more common power outages and then having that promise yanked away is an objectively evil thing to do. no matter how you spin in.

upvote 59 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5d

honestly your opinion don’t even matter anymore after you couldn’t be bothered to do a decent google search and tried to pretend this WASN’T for a children’s hospital.

upvote 26 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5d

Regardless of how much a hospital makes, you don’t think the government should have an interest in ensuring that REGARDLESS of anything they should ensure that the hospital has a backup generator to ensure that children don’t die incase of an power outage?

upvote 34 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5d

Tbf this hospital just got backlash for serious executive compensation. But the larger theme is that this was absolutely political. This was one of the things cut under Vought’s attack on “Green New Scam” funding

upvote 31 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 5d

exactly. the problem isn’t that WeLl ThE hOsPiTaL cAn PaY fOr It, the problem is that this was clearly a political issue and everyone is acting like WE’RE the crazy ones for recognizing that.

upvote 32 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 5d

There’s a lot of missing context here. This hospital could definitely use diesel generators instead, like many hospitals, but the power outages from wildfires here are common. They’d be running more often than most hospitals’ generators. They’re looking for other funding sources atm, because this would offer a much cleaner approach for a region where the air quality sucks

upvote 27 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 5d

People from the hospital and some contractors also dispute that there were any fire safety concerns or missed deadlines

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5d

“Adequately advance the nation’s energy needs” means it didn’t rely on companies lining Trump’s pockets lmfao. The hospital and contractors are saying no deadlines were missed and there are no safety concerns

upvote 74 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5d

You trump bitches are so fucking stupid😭 like we are arguing about funding to HOSPITALS! Do you fucking hear your self you fucking cuck

upvote 29 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5d

not letting children die isn't 'economically viable' but spending a quarter of a billion dollars on the pedo ballroom is?

upvote 82 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4d

r u not embarrassed by the downvotes💀 js shut up pls

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #15 4d

Atp I might upvote just so they don’t get to 25 and these comments disappear. Might be better for them to continue to be embarrassed 💀

upvote 26 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4d

I do this all the time in my college’s yy 😭 some comments and posts are too laughable to be taken down

upvote 18 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4d

This is what politicians refer to as “spin” and right now you’re seeing what the right wing WANTS you to see, so you don’t realize that children are going to die directly because of this decision by the Trump administration, and then change your vote in the next cycle because they’re committing actual evil with zero remorse.

upvote 22 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #19 4d

i agree but isn’t it possible that the spin is happening from both sides? the left is spinning stuff too to make trump look bad. the fact that this was a general cut but they want to highlight the children hospital part. even though that hospital likely will continue as usual

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4d

a spin requires distorting the facts to make it seem like something different, something that without context appears to be something else. this is literally just cutting money to a children’s hospital. there is no spin, that is ACTUALLY what is happening.

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4d

Spin is always happening on both sides, but for this particular story it is an objective fact that children are going to die, and the Trump administration doesn’t give a shit. Maybe they’ll say that they do at some point, but actions speak louder than words

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4d

Cutting grants that were previously given is unprecedented, no? Please correct me if I’m wrong

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4d

This isn’t even a spin concern. This is an objective question

upvote 11 downvote