Anonymous #1 11w

YES THIS EXACTLY

3

Anonymous OP 11w

We need to watch out for leftist grifters. I think they realize there’s an audience of desperate people rn

8

Anonymous #1 11w

nick fuentes is slightly leaning into it. obviously he doesn’t position himself as a leftist, but he’s clearly intelligent enough to lean into it occasionally (even with anti-semitic backings on the zionism issues) but yes, for sure. i mean dean withers isn’t exactly leftist leftist, but we had a mutual friend a few years back. dean is a grifter and i, looking at it from a logical standpoint and ignoring ethics, get it and understand that appeal

6

Anonymous #1 11w

No it doesn’t. Socialism is a step in a process of moving toward communism.

4

Anonymous #1 11w

Karl Marx, inventor of these concepts primarily, did not even distinguish between socialism and communism. They were effectively the same thing to him, just taking place at different points in a nations transition to the end state that is communism.

5

Anonymous #2 11w

massive massive oversimplification and misrepresentation of what socialism and communism are

6

Anonymous #2 11w

Doesn’t “socialist” imply you want socialism but no further transition towards communism?

6

Anonymous OP 11w

It’s literally exactly how Marx described it.

-1

Anonymous #1 11w

No, not really, even if they believe that to be the case. Because socialism can only really ever be a transition to communism. I self describe as a socialist, but I understand socialism is a stepping stone.

-1