Anonymous #2 1d

So I could make a joke about killing Mamdani or AOC and you’d be chill with that?

0

Anonymous OP 1d

I mean yeah no one’s going to stop you, just wouldn’t really have the same humorous effect as a guy who thinks black people cant fly planes and that we should bring back public executions getting publicly executed lmao

14

Anonymous #2 1d

No no. Whether someone would STOP me wasn’t the question (even though we all know the butthurt YikYak mods would) The question was would you be OKAY with it?

-2

Anonymous OP 1d

I would be okay with it, just probably wouldn’t be funny. No irony or punchline 🤷‍♂️

6

Anonymous #2 1d

Okay

0

Anonymous OP 1d

Dawg Charlie is already dead it’s not the same

6

Anonymous #4 1d

You’re right. It’s worse

-1

Anonymous #2 1d

Like that’s not you when someone gets misgendered

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

No it isn’t the last thing Charlie literally tweeted was another defense for the idea that all black people are violent. He died with that being his last tweets.

3

Anonymous OP 1d

Yeah cause that’s actual bullying

3

Anonymous #4 1d

And celebrating someone’s death isn’t?

-2

Anonymous OP 1d

Would you call celebrating Hitler’s death bullying? And if Hitler is “too extreme” let’s say Epstein. Or if his wife died. Btw conservatives were actively mocking the death of literal children who were murdered or committed suicide. So you know what don’t complain if people say yippee to the death of a grown ass man who said if his own daughter were raped he wouldn’t even get an abortion for her

5

Anonymous #4 1d

You just compared him to Hitler. I’m not even answering the question 😂

-1

Anonymous #1 1d

Wrong cause the KKK still exists

0

Anonymous OP 1d

Idk man, his views on black people are pretty indistinguishable from Hitler

1

Anonymous #2 1d

Whatever dude

-1

Anonymous #4 1d

Dude they’re not doing shit anymore. It’s like 5,000 people

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

If Charlie Kirk was alive in the 1940s he would have been on Hitler’s side. In fact Charlie would have tried to join the SS. A lot of current conservative politicians would have. In fact the only real reasons a lot of actual conservative politicians only support Israel is because of 1) lobbying and 2) they hate Muslims more and Israel is killing them. And Charlie supported the genocide towards Palestine. Btw if you say “not a genocide” per the literal definition it is.

2

Anonymous #1 1d

The KKK isn’t going on lynching sprees as a group anymore. And you’re right, I shouldn’t have said the KKK I should have just said white supremacy groups still exist.

1

Anonymous #4 1d

And that Charlie was one of them

1

Anonymous #4 1d

Dude, Charlie was not a white supremacist. He wouldn’t advocate for legal immigration if he was. Every white supremacist wants immigration totally halted

-1

Anonymous #2 1d

Bro he never said that black people cant fly planes

0

Anonymous #5 1d

Cry about semantics all you want, here’s exactly what he said.

5

Anonymous #2 1d

That’s not saying they can’t fly

-1

Anonymous #5 1d

You’re right the specific line he made was that he hoped if the pilot is black they’re qualified. Which is a comment backed by multiple other occasions at different times over his career where he would state that black people who hold high positioned jobs are not qualified for them because they are only ever hired for their skin color and not because they are actually qualified for the job.

1

Anonymous #5 1d

So basically he was saying black people cant fly planes because he believed and spread the idea that high positioned jobs like being a pilot have been filled with unskilled people because black people are only hired for diversity and not for their qualifications.

1

Anonymous OP 1d

It’s not mods that are taking down your posts it’s that certain communities automatically delete a post after a certain amount of downvotes. So what you’re upset about it democracy…

1

Anonymous OP 1d

You’re right it’s him spreading the idea that black people only get good jobs cause they’re black and not because they’re qualified.

1

Anonymous #1 1d

what would you call the great replacement theory? is that a white supremacist thing or where does it get categorized

5

Anonymous #3 1d

That’s just a real thing bro look at Europe rn😭😭

-1

Anonymous #1 1d

so are you gonna categorize it for us or what. im waiting for you to say

2

Anonymous #3 1d

I’d say it’s pretty moderate to address it as an issue. Wanting to keep your country’s social cohesion isn’t white supremacy. Again he also advocated for legal immigration consistently

-1

Anonymous #3 1d

The great replacement theory is the idea that minorities are trying to have as many kids as possible and take over jobs to replace and destroy the white population. So yeah white supremacy

6

Anonymous #1 1d

id ask if your parents are related to preserve the white race but thats a rhetorical question and i wont waste our time

2

Anonymous #4 1d

Ehhhh it’s more so a 150 page report by the United Nations in 2000 which says countries with lower fertility rates need to have migration to replace the workforce. Which in Europe, I mean they are having tons of kids faster than Europeans, replacing a percentage of the population. But at least they haven’t taken over the jobs yet

-2

Anonymous #1 1d

oh youre a real intellectual are you huh

3

Anonymous #1 1d

Except minorities aren’t doing that to take over white people. They’re not conquering white people.

1

Anonymous #4 1d

No definitely not for the most part. But I mean hey if it’s causing issues in Europe then it is Europe’s prerogative to do something about it. I’m totally chill with the Latinos eh here they’re pretty cool

0