Idk why but unless it’s important to the plot, or the character’s perspective, I don’t describe a lot of my characters visually now that I think about it.
Ngl I like that, perceiving the character more than absolutely necessary takes me out of visualizing everything else
3
Anonymous13w
I can’t seem to find ways to fit it in and have it be relevant and a natural flow
3
Anonymous#116w
I mean I’ll describe like “shaggy hair” but I might not say if the hair is blonde or brown unless I really feel like it fits with what I’m writing. Tbf I’ve only written short stories. When I move to longer works I might get more specific. I’ll have to see what happens 🤷🏼♀️
3
AnonymousOP16w
Yeah this is the perfect level of detail imo
1
Anonymous#116w
Only so many times I can read about someone’s stormy blue eyes and sandy blonde hair before I want to throw up
2
Anonymous#116w
Yeah exactly. If I’m gonna specify I’m gonna try to be more basic. “Deep blue” “hazel brown” “yellowish gold” is honestly enough. Less is more. Especially with a narrator that’s in the story who might lack the words for specificity
1
Anonymous#213w
Exactly it feels so disruptive and unnatural to me
3
AnonymousOP13w
How necessary is it really?
Maybe reread some books you like that have a similar perspective/plot/style and see how/what they do?
1
Anonymous#213w
I think it’s that more y/a has more forward descriptions whereas adult fiction described people less literally and more in relation to other things if that makes sense