Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Let me explain more.
-5 upvote, 7 comments. Yik Yak image post by Anonymous in Ask Women. "Let me explain more."
Should people who are deemed to be risky job candidate’s because of lack of consistent employment history be able to opt out of their right to be paid for their work in order to prove themselves? Why or why not?
upvote -5 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Still slavery. Violating the 13th amendment. Whats stopping companies from just saying its not working out and forcing you to pay back wages?

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6d

No that’s stupid people need money to live

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6d

That’s called an internship.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 6d

They need to provide evidence to the government at the Penalty of perjury that you are not a good candidate. Under this system you don’t have to pay back wages because you don’t get paid unless you get hired.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6d

So still another problem with that bud. They could easily just hire you then fire you to get around that. In addition that is an overreach of the government into the economy violating the laissez faire policy.

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 6d

The company cannot fire you without government approval for six months.

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6d

Once again that is an overreach and of the government and what they can and cannot do. Check the articles of the constitution and you'll see that what you're proposing violates the constitution

upvote 11 downvote