
going to assume they mean potentially violent misogynists and not just men who can't get laid (should be separate terms, but i digress) nobody should be jailed without due process or for thoughts/speech (save immediate threats), but convicted domestic abusers or rapists should get harsh sentences this entire thing feels like ragebait
Clearly this is a hypothetical and internment camps would be wildly undemocratic and a violation of human rights. However, I do believe that people who display behaviors and foster communities based off hate and violence towards members of others communities, should be treated as one would treat organized crime
what do you mean by "allowed"? i think he should be ridiculed (or, bc he thrives off attention, ignored), and private social media companies are more than welcome to ban him. unless he is involved in terrorism or similar, i do not think the us government should be able to send him to jail for being a degen chud
I doubt right wingers will ever get any real power in government again after this disastrous administration. Even republicans are turning against trump now that they see he’s done nothing for affordability. And he lost the Hispanic vote for another good 20 years because of how cruel he’s been with ICE. So I think we’ll be fine. Maybe at worst we get a moderate mitt romney type IF dems drop the ball, but def not another trump anytime soon
1) you don't want republicans to win, so you make an absolute claim that they won't 2) my fundamental argument is that nobody should be jailed for nonviolent speech, bc such laws can be weaponized against dissenters anywhere on the political spectrum. your argument seems to be that the state should punish anyone who says things you, personally, don't like 3) bc you *think* the gop won't take power you refuse to engage w any related hypotheticals