Anonymous #3 1w

Kirk says something that’s just flat out wrong almost every time he debates

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Such as?

14

Anonymous #3 1w

“Blacks commit more crimes than whites”

6

Anonymous #4 1w

Average Charlie Kirk “civil discourse” fan

0

Anonymous #4 1w

I’ve been watching Charlie Kirk since before COVID. Here’s some homework: “If I see a Black pilot, I’m gonna be like ‘Boy, I hope he’s qualified’”

8

Anonymous #4 1w

“Prowling Blacks go around to target white people. That’s a fact.”

18

Anonymous #4 1w

[Regarding Black women] “You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot.”

8

Anonymous OP 1w

Watch the recent subway video

9

Anonymous OP 1w

DEI said they would put more focus on a balance of skin color than skill. So I would question myself if someone was hired on their skin color instead of their piloting ability.

27

Anonymous OP 1w

Sounds like a statement based on DEI

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Isn’t that proven statically? In terms of amount population vs percentage

12

Anonymous OP 1w

That’s just statistically factual. Facts don’t care about your feelings.

11

Anonymous OP 1w

We’re not all fans of civil discourse? Average murdering people who have different opinions fan 🫵

16

Anonymous #3 1w

Person to person, are YOU really going around looking at people’s skin color and saying “damn you’re Black, I’m not sure if you really earned this.”? Because if you are then I don’t think we’re going to agree, ever. If you’re just trying to defend Kirk or argue a point then we can do that. But if your point is based on that ingrained belief that Black people are less intelligent then we’re going to have to agree to disagree.

0

Anonymous OP 1w

“I got that white girl” — the statement made by a black man who senselessly murdered a white girl on a public bus

0

Anonymous #4 1w

Dude I’ve been watching Kirk since I was 13, that’s not what “civil discourse” looks like. I thought everyone else learned this after going through puberty

4

Anonymous OP 1w

That’s obviously not what they’re saying. They’re saying that we should be skeptical of minorities hired by companies who say that they hire people just because of the color of their skin. If they hired people just bc they were white I’d be skeptical then too

5

Anonymous #4 1w

OHHH one Black person killed one White person once. Now I understand, all Black people are criminals who should be executed! Was that the point you were trying to get across?

5

Anonymous OP 1w

Civil discourse includes two people who have different opinions talking it out. That’s what he did in college campuses and that’s what we’re doing now. Doesn’t matter if I call you mean names or not. That’s my perogative

2

Anonymous OP 1w

If the employer of that person says they are going to hire based off skin color instead of skill. Then yes. There are plenty of brilliant people of all colors. But when employers speak like that I think it’s fair to ask such questions. If the NBA enforced rules to include more white players. Kicking out black players. Everyone would acknowledge the white players are there because of DEI(their skin color) instead of their raw talent.

3

Anonymous OP 1w

Wow talk about jumping to conclusions. Tell me how 13% of the population manages to have at least one third of all violent crime in America.

0

Anonymous #3 1w

Precisely the reason why people should be skeptical of companies who say they’re going to hire minorities just because they’re a minority. If they’re x person is a minority and y company says they hire people just because they’re minorities (dei) then it is logical to be skeptical of their abilities.

0

Anonymous #4 1w

Did you ever read that image you uploaded? If so, can you please share with the class if that image is a table of convictions or if it’s a table of ARRESTS, which we know are disproportionately higher for Black communities. This is the issue with Kirk fanboys. Why can’t you just be plain racist? I would genuinely prefer it if you just went around and called people slurs. Then everyone would know to avoid you. Instead you’re trying to back your biases with stats that you didn’t even fully read

12

Anonymous OP 1w

So you’re saying I’m wrong? Because Google is free.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Also you guys love to throw around the word racist without even understanding the meaning. I don’t give a fuck what your skin color is. If you’re gonna commit significantly more crime than any other ethnicity in America then I’m going to be more wary about being around such people (doesn’t matter what the skin color is—Asian,black,Hispanic,white, literally any of them).

0

Anonymous #3 1w

If you wanted to statistically make the claim “Blacks commit more crimes than whites do,” you would need to show me stats that have Black people in an area committing a greater amount of crimes than White people in that area.

-1

Anonymous #5 1w

You got a point somewhere there?

8

Anonymous OP 1w

Yo dude you gonna respond to the screenshot I commented with about the conviction statistics or are you done arguing bc you lost?

-2

Anonymous #4 1w

Don’t worry big dawg I got you next

6

Anonymous OP 1w

Word hold that L 🤣🤣🤣. Typical libtard. Don’t even have 2 brain cells to rub together

0

Anonymous #4 1w

Yes. You are proving my point bruh. Also I say racist because I just don’t believe someone who doesn’t already think “Black people are stupid/violent” goes out of their way/falls so easily for racist rhetoric, misread stats, and Google AI Overview. If you just said “I dislike Black people just cuz I think they’re stupid and violent” then fine. But you’re trying to back it with evidence that doesn’t actually support your claim, which you would know if you READ THE SCREENSHOT YOU UPLOADED

13

Anonymous OP 1w

It’s called pattern recognition not racism. Example: most dogs vs pit bulls in terms of aggression. Also respond to my comment about the DEI

0

Anonymous OP 1w

Lol you think that black people are always wrongly incarcerated? That laughable. I gave the statistic because even if you took out a certain percent due to wrongful conviction, THEY STILL COMMIT MORE CRIMES. A BLACK GUY GETTING ARRESTED FOR ROBBING SOMEONE IS NOT RACIST

5

Anonymous #3 1w

Are you comparing Black people to a separate breed of aggressive dog?

9

Anonymous #3 1w

Also imma get you right after #4 they been waiting patiently for a bit

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Oh here it comes!!! tHaTS RAcIsT 😔😔😔

0

Anonymous OP 1w

The area is called the United States of America

9

Anonymous #4 1w

dawg when did I say that??…I’m saying that you uploaded a screenshot saying that Black people are convicted at higher rates than White people. I don’t want to insult you but…you know what a rate is, right? That means that of say 1000 arrests (already biased), more Black people are convicted than 1000 White people. That does not mean that the Black people in California commit more crime than the White people in California. you making upload screenshots of YOUR OWN sources for you…bro…

14

Anonymous #3 1w

What source are we using when we say “DEI said they would….”

12

Anonymous #4 1w

Sad part is I’m not even a leftist. I own guns and come from a military family and I think capitalism is a mostly good idea. I just think Charlie Kirk and his glazer gang are assholes who use Google AI Overview as their reasoning for why Black people are all violent criminals

17

Anonymous OP 1w

Have you listened to a full Charlie Kirk debate/video instead of cherry picked clips? Like fully embrace it and think it through.

6

Anonymous #3 1w

It’s literally the FBI crime database

0

Anonymous OP 1w

The point being you saying people shouldn’t have empathy for him because you think he is evil is actually contrary to Jesus’ most basic teachings of mercy and charity.

3

Anonymous #5 1w

Not saying no one should feel empathy for him. Just saying I have has much empathy, mercy, and charity for Charlie Kirk as he had for schoolchildren.

6

Anonymous #6 1w

I definitely know about Christianity bro, I used to be a professional Kirk MAGA bootlicking Bible-thumper just like you. Then I hit puberty

1

Anonymous #3 1w

Yes. Next question

6

Anonymous OP 1w

Ah, so you have an understanding of Christian theology, doctrines, and philosophical principles that is roughly equivalent to that of a child’s. That tracks, actually.

-2

Anonymous #6 1w

You got a point in there somewhere or nah?

5

Anonymous OP 1w

He does…

3

Anonymous #9 1w

He pushed the idea of the great replacement theory (a well known white supremacist idealogy). He said abortion was worst than the Holocaust. He even said that gun deaths were worth it to keep the 2nd amendment and wanted looser gun laws.

8

Anonymous #2 1w

Weird because he sure didn’t preach what he supposedly followed

4

Anonymous #9 1w

Confused how this has anything to do with what I said

2

Anonymous #2 1w

That’s okay! This is a post about Charlie Kirk…Charlie Kirk has supported political violence (you were given an example)…violence and loving your neighbor are opposites.

17

Anonymous #3 1w

That’s actually a really good comparison bc pit bulls as dogs are highly misunderstood and actually very friendly and tend to be good with children. But bc people used them for fighting now “all pit bulls are aggressive” when in reality they are one of the most friendly breeds. You need to look past your stereotyping and see people as humans not as black vs white

9

Anonymous OP 1w

Ok sassy mcsassy pants. Your post was about people in comments being supportive to him and his family seeing as he just died and said it was unchristian. I said it is Christian to show love to people regardless of if you agree with them or not. I never said I agreed with his political views. What I do agree with is showing love and compassion to his friends, family, and supporters during the time of mourning as I believe that’s what is most moral. Hope that helps

4

Anonymous OP 1w

Case in point.

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Nuh uh uh. Everyone can scroll up to what I posted and see that what you said is Cappy McCappy Pants. No where did I say that people supporting his family is bad. Idk why you think I would have a vendetta against two toddlers. I only have an issue with him and his supporters and trying to make it seem like he was even a decently good person. He was not. Compassion to the mourning, yes. Supporting Kirk’s legacy of bigotry, no.

0

The onus is not on me to explain the extremely clear message to a rage-baiting fool. But I think you do, in fact, understand, which means you’re not even worthy of the pity afforded to those who truly lack that capacity.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

But his supporters are in mourning too, no? If you were to follow the morals and/or Christian principles you’ve outlined into ur post, then it would be right to extend them your sympathies regardless of beliefs. That’s what I’m saying sir/miss happy mccappy pants McGee

5

Anonymous #3 6d

So do you like the guy? I’m curious about what you think!

1

Anonymous #6 6d

I genuinely hope you find the capacity to be kind. And aren’t we, as Christians, explicitly taught that we’re called to teach the Word? The way you instantly defaulted to insults, then refused to explain your theocratic reasoning, makes me question whether you’re even approaching this in sincerity. Idk, man…if you really were trying to follow Christ’s example, wouldn’t your first instinct be compassion and clarity - not this odd ragebait and gatekeeping?

1

Anonymous #2 6d

I appreciate the gender inclusivity of your reply. IMO if people were Christians, they wouldn’t be supporting Charlie to begin with, so there should be 0 Charlie supporters and 0 Charlie mourners outside of his immediate family, who I believe deserve sympathies.

0

Anonymous #14 6d

“Do not take me away with the wicked And with the workers of iniquity, Who speak peace to their neighbors, But evil is in their hearts. Give them according to their deeds, And according to the wickedness of their endeavors; Give them according to the work of their hands; Render to them what they deserve.”

1

Anonymous #6 6d

“It’s not my job to explain the point I’m making!” Man you’re making your team look bad rn…PR department gotta come get you. I could do a better job defending Kirk/Christianity than you’ve done and I don’t believe in either

0

Anonymous #6 6d

“Render to them what they deserve…” So fitting for Charlie Kirk. Good find #6

0

Anonymous OP 6d

We are called to give evil no quarter and make no peace with it.

1

Anonymous #6 6d

So….?

1

Anonymous OP 6d

But that’s not reality. You can’t no true scotsman all right wing Christians. And you can’t claim superior Christian morals if you can’t even follow their principles enough to just feel sympathy for people. It doesn’t even make any sense.

4

Anonymous #2 6d

Yes. That’s not reality because Charlie supporters are fake Christians, shown by their support of Charlie. That was the topic sentence of this post… No one here said “all right wing Christians are fake,” you just made that up. I’m also not claiming to have superior Christian morals. I feel sympathy for his wife, daughters etc and I think Morgan Wallen helping them financially today was awesome. But I don’t feel sympathy for Charlie or for his fanboys, who lost 0. Charlie was a bad person.

0

Anonymous OP 6d

That is, there’s nothing to mourn about if you didn’t know Charlie and Charlie didn’t know you. There’s no respects to pay because Charlie deserves no respect because he was a bad person. The funeral should be empty.

0

Anonymous OP 6d

mostly empty, again except for family

0

Anonymous OP 6d

You can’t no true scotsman Christians. Again. That’s literally not how Christianity works. You can’t be a fake Christian because you supported a “bad person”. The qualifications for Christian are that you have accepted Jesus as your savior. Not accepted Christ and oop doesn’t support Charlie Kirk. That’s not a thing. Having sympathy for people in mourning (of which there are millions) is the Christian thing to do as outlined by the Bible. I’m sorry you don’t like that, but that’s what it be

2

Anonymous #2 5d

Idk what version of Christianity you practice that doesn’t involve any values or specifications on how you live your life, but it sounds like a lot of fun. When I say Christians I’m talking about people who are Christ FOLLOWERS not just people who prayed the Salvation Prayer once and then do whatever they want

-1

Anonymous #2 5d

Supporting Charlie Kirk runs directly contrary to worshipping Jesus as your Lord and savior, which is something anyone who has had a relationship with Jesus would know. Charlie is a disgrace to everything Jesus preached while on Earth (care for the poor, sick, Gentile), and just like all Charlie supporters, a Christian in words only. For there to be real Christians there has to be fake Christians. Otherwise your group is not really a group.

0

Anonymous #2 5d

These aren’t just my ideas either. “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles? Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’” (Matthew 7:21-23) Sounds like people who claim Christ but hate empathy

0

Anonymous OP 5d

Funny how you’re still attempting to no true Scotsman Christians. Regardless, everything you just said holds little to no more meaning than lorem ipsum. All you did was strawman and no true Scotsman and debatably ad hominem. The values laid out in the Bible do not call for Christ followers to withhold sympathy from people we disagree with. Jesus walked with sinners of all kinds and prayed for them. He even prayed for the Romans as he died on the cross. We remember what the Romans believed?

1