
___joker__
Talks around age of consent, societal mores regarding sex, and the broader meaning of consent are probably some of the most dogshit convos you can have. You have either performative outrage/accusatory people OR just actual hebos/pedos. Shit is fucked.themind._.ofhueyfreeman25
If u argue the age of consent should be lowered because āother countries do itā or you touch kids you should be 7 Daysed.I personally think they need to expand the age range Romeo and Juliet laws to encompass 16-20 or at least something with with age groupings that protect minors from themselves as well, but thatās honestly about as far as I go with things. Age of consent laws are good because they actually do protect minors from being exploited. People only think of the sex part and I donāt think they even get to the horrible situations a young person can be put in by simply existing in that kind of relationship.
Thatās what Iām saying. Lowering the age of consent doesnāt protect minors at all if anything it endangers them more. If heās trying to argue it should be lowered to āprotect kids from themselvesā then he should argue for them to not charge teenagers around the same age who sleep with each other, like I said. Ig what I said would encompass expanding Romeo and Juliet laws which I donāt necessarily disagree with
Just because a teenager CAN give consent doesnāt make it justifiable. Attraction is just a sliver of the problem. An established 20 year old getting with a 15 year IS a bad thing. That level of power dynamics SHOULD be illegal. That goes for the same with teachers and students for obvious reasons.
I mean Iām not going to defend ā18 yearsā as a descriptive claim that anyone below that cannot consentā¦.but Iāll definitely defend it as a normative claim as in it ought to be 18 years old because it seems like the best age of when we can claim someone is an adult. Theyāre done with school, they can work/have a job(full-time), they can live on their own, etc. Is there a 16 or 17 year old out there that could also? Probably, but the whole point is to say that 18 is the line weāve chosenā¦.
I get that. I more so think it should be a little older than 18 just because 18 year olds are still immature and donāt always make the best choices. Ik I didnāt always. I do understand that theyāre usually living on their own(maybe not in the economyš) but I think we should also take mental maturity into consideration and I do understand thereās 40 year olds who are still immature
Consent isnāt something that magically appears much like a 17 year old suddenly turning 18 and now theyāre instantly attractive. Age gap stuff(for legal consenting adults) is a fairly big societal more in regard to something like a 40 year old dating an 18 year old or something along those linesā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦..
Age gaps arenāt illegal obviously but I believe there are some stipulations depending on states. For instance, in Michigan, I believe the age of consent is 16. That means they are functionally able to have sex with a 40 year old. The stipulation is that the older person cannot occupy a position of authority such as a teacher, administrator, cop, child care, fellow employee, etc.
Age gaps donāt necessarily bother me on a surface level, but I think itās highly dependent on the situation. If a 20 year old, who works a full-time job, has their own housing, etc is having a relationship with a 50 year old? Thatās not really exploitative. If theyāre a poor 20 year old college student and itās some sugar daddy/mommy type shitā¦then thatās hella exploitative and is wrong. Should they be locked up for it? No. Should they be questioned and pressed on it?ā¦ehhhā¦I think so.
Age is typically one of the easier determiners of who holds more power when it comes to power dynamics. Itās possible for someone who is younger to have power over someone who is older, but itās usually niche or uncommon compared the the traditional āold man/woman dating a young adultā